THOUGHTS ON FARMING
Long term readers are pretty much tuned into my frequency, to their sorrow knowing every nook and cranny of my thought process. They also know I like to repeat myself since I’m convinced that most of you are simply not listening very well, or at a minimum the new guys read a passing comment of mine but are not familiar with my thoughts behind it. So today I wish to amplify my rational for not covering farming in much detail. It is kind of like my gun choices, there are many reasons why I advocate certain ones and not others. Unless you read more than one article on it you might not fully understand what I am saying. Which of course is my fault as an author for not communicating better.
*
Farming is a great skill and very much needed. But only under certain circumstances. It is not a magic bullet for all your needs. In a Greater Depression scenario, farming is going to be a great way to feed yourself. As the currency erodes you might have few other options. As taxes dry up because of business failures and high unemployment we might also see welfare benefits become scarce ( we can’t pay for imported oil, food transport becomes problematic, price controls coupled with hyperinflation see no supplies on shelves- you might be issued Food Stamps but there won’t be anything to buy ). You will have a hard enough time not getting evicted, but at least you have food from your garden. Unfortunately that is the only scenario in which a garden is viable. Anything more severe such as a massive natural disaster ( asteroid, Yellowstone ) and a garden will attract mutant zombie bikers. And that is even if you can garden.
*
A Yellowstone eruption or asteroid strike would throw enough crap into the atmosphere that you wouldn’t be able to farm for several years. A full scale collapse such as oil production falling below a certain level and immediately you are preyed upon by either looters or by the next government protection racket to come along ( heard of marching armies living off the land? That is your crops they are talking about ). You are tied down by the land, held hostage to it. Of course, to be honest a food stash gives you the same problem. You are tied to an area holding your stash of food ( separate caches are good but still hold you to an area ). Farming will of course be necessary in the long term, but it is only going to be viable after a stable society has been re-formed. And if that is the case you can be sure of a mass die-off. It sucks if one of the dead is you, but if you survive it also means there will once again be areas freed up for nomadic herding or even sustenance gathering. Again, this is in the long term. It won’t happen right away. Outside of a partial collapse it is best to sit back, relax, and wait it out with stored foods.
*
If you see nothing ahead except a hard economic ride, by all means try to buy farm land. As long as law and order are maintained you can’t go wrong feeding yourself and selling the surplus. Just be sure if you have a mortgage that it can be paid through the chaos. Any Peak Oil future and you can bet it will all collapse. In this case I would be far away from a farm. I would want as few people as possible surrounding me as I hunker down and wait out the die-offs. My personal plan is to turn to herding, the high desert supporting that life style well. I realize the problems with this approach, such as lack of practice beforehand and possible a 100 year drought we might be entering ( like one that killed off the earlier Indians down Colorado/Arizona way ). But it is no less of a gamble than farming. All your money and sweat will end up useless if we enter the downturn and it falls too far if you are on a farm. In other words, it is like relying on a modern arsenal rather than a muzzleloader or a crossbow. If a multigenerational collapse occurs the firearms become worthless in time. You made the wrong bet. I’m rooting for the Saxon 19th century technology scenario. I’m placing a bet on that happening. The stakes are my life as I’m not trying to down grade my defense equipment past that point. Time will tell if it is correct.
*
The standard solution to farms being a target is getting a retreat out in the boonies. But that approach is costly. None of you reading me can afford that ( if you can afford that, take me with you- I work real cheap as you can tell from this Blog and my house has wheels ). For most of us, we are gambling on a certain outcome. Not too severe of weather if farming. Not starving out in our desert retreat if the economy falls but the government doesn’t. In a settled area avoiding a pandemic. In the boonies being able to get to town ( there will be highwaymen ). There is no right answer, just you taking a gamble on what you think might happen. Here I am just trying to give you all the reasons a particular choice may not be as good as you thought. The weather might turn out unfriendly to crops. Since all good farmland is in densely populated areas looters will try to steal from you. The new government might turn you into a serf. In a stable political environment farming is great, one of the best ways to be independent. As soon as anarchy strikes ( I am an Anarchist, I use the term for lawlessness ) it will hurt you rather than help you. And as for dreaming of a Rhodesian style fortress farm, remember the scene from The Postman when the town gate is shot at with an artillery piece ( and remember it can be duplicated with primitive black powder pieces ).
*
Just “food” for thought ( yuk, yuk, I crack myself up ).
END
please visit www.bisonpress.com
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
"Anarchy" simply means "no ruler".
Good post, Jim.
Death by ignorance.
Two of the earliest 'godfathers' of the modern day survivalist movement.
http://www.kurtsaxon.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Tappan
There was some debate as to who of these two men actually holds the title of 'godfather' on another survival forum.
Well, Mr. Saxon seems to be still with us, although he has not answered any of my mail.
Mr. Tappan died of congestive heart failure in his forties. (Was it an inherited disease or lifestyle related? Don't know)
But the facts show Mr. Saxon was the ultimate survivor bewteen the two men.
Survival is also about comfort...we try to be as comfortable as possible in uncomfortable circumstances.
But realize that we can only make ourselves so cushy and still live a healthy life.
You can pay your butler to wipe your ass, but you can't pay your butler to eat healthy food for you and do your exercise and survival skills training. Survival is a selfish activity.
I posted 'The Foundation of Survival' aka 'Rule of 7' to another thread and it was not thought of highly. 'Pop' responded with "Crap", 'Anarky' discounted it altogether.
Well, if you can look at the 'Rule of 7' without perceived prejudice, you will find all the answers to your survival quest there. Now, I am not claiming it to be a treatise on survival, but it is an exact outline or blueprint of what one needs to survive.
Of course, people get attached to ego and get blinded as was shown by the prior responders. But if you work on being open to new thought you can get let go of such small minded thinking.
Adaptation and flexibility are the hallmarks of a good survivalist. The more you hit ideas with prejudice and are closed minded, the poorer you will do at survival.
Mental preparedness and physical fitness are the foundations of all our survival quests. For the mind guides the body, but an unfit body is not able to respond to the minds guidance.
We can see Mr. Tappan was lacking in this area and died at a young age,
We become mentally prepared when we are able to use the 7 Skills to defeat the 7 Enemies of Life.
The 7 Skills:
Fire Starting
Water Procurement
Shelter Building
Foraging for food
Signaling
First Aid
Self Defense
7 Enemies of Life:
Fear and anxiety
Cold and Heat
Thirst
Hunger
Boredom and Loneliness
Fatigue
Pain and Injury
In essence, we develop self confidence by mastering the skills needed to overcome any situation that arises to threaten our life.
Always remember, none of us will be ultimate survivors - we all have to die one day.
But the successful survivor extends his or her life beyond an earlier death...a death that was caused by ignorance of how to make that life last longer.
Very good way to look at things Mr. Jim
And 1:42 PM posted some good thoughts also.
We can prepare and, try and prepare, but its all still just a crap shoot as far as how the emergencies and or hard times will occur and how they will effect us and ours.
Prepare, plan, pray and hope for all the best luck in the world to perhaps extend our lives and those of our survival team members lives.
I agree with you in some ways. We need to differentiate between natural disasters which would dramatically change our enviornment and a long term TEOTWAWKI which just comes from the lights going out, stores and gas stations running dry. In a non natural disaster TEOTWAWKI nobody would be safe. To think that a man in a trailer in the middle of nowhere would be completely safe while a man in a house surrounded by corn wouldn't is at best biased. It is like asking if ar-15's are better then sks's on www.ar15.com.
The big difference between massive modern agriculture and low level subsistance is that you need alot less land. This is probably not the case in Nevada but in alot of other states realtively junk land can support alot of people. There is a family of 4 in LA who feed themselves entirely off of stuff grown on their normal sized city lot. I am not saying that they would survive something major but alot of food can be grown on a halfway productive (not desert, some water) junk acre or so.
The Rhodesian model is flawed because it was grip up civil unrest and they were able to use the money from the massive surpluses of commercial agriculture to hire soldiers to do night security etc.
Also something to consider. While you are sitting around in your trailer/ cabin/home what will you be doing? Little or no power, alot of time. I think that people could end up gardening if not for the immediate necessity of food but because theres not squat else to do.
The problem with your Postman example is that the bad guys got the city gates in the first place.
I think it'd be necessary and desirable to have a number of groups of men or women, numbering between 2 and 4, well versed in field craft, marksmanship and other martial tactics, patrolling the limits of one's area, scouting and reporting on possible trouble in order to give time for the militia to assemble and provide a defense beyond the town's perimeter, as well as acting a a delaying force with harassing fires.
Check out John Plaster's book The Ultimate Sniper.
A mortar would be much more easy to do I think, considering I've seen the excerpt from Ragnar Benson's book "Big Book of Homemade Weapons"
where he built one and ammo with little more than plumping pipe and a brazing torch and hacksaw. Ammo was improvised explosives packed into a pipe bomb looking round, set off with a blasting cap ignited by a length of time fuse lit by the propelling charge, a shotgun blank.
People will be tied to the land no matter what they do-either you've got a large stockpile of stored foods, or they're a farmer/herder.
They'll all need to eat and drink, they may never need to fight, and the apocalypse may never come, or come in a form one didn't expect.
I'd go with the land that has decent soil and water, and some population to which I can sell my goods to and barter for services and if need be, do my hitch as a Boarder Ranger/Scout Sniper rather than trying to make it in the desert.
A guy on the AR15.com Survival Forum quite awhile back boasted of buying a place in North Dakota with some outbuildings, a well, and no house for $6,000. Don't remember the acreage but it was more than one. A person I knew awhile back's daughter bought a large chunk of land, like 20 acres for $40,000 in the MN Arrowhead region near Lake Superior.
Higher quality patches of land are out there, for not much more than a waterless patch of desert, it would seem.
I wonder if Tappan might have survived his heart attack if he wasn't out in the boonies, away from 1st rate medical care?
Post a Comment