nukes soon

NUKES SOON
Okay, before I forget again, big hugs and little kisses to www.tslrf.blogspot.com . The Monday post was on picking survival guns. I might not wholeheartedly agree with the Glock pick, but all in all the best arsenal choice I've seen in a long time. Why? Because it was from a focus on toughness. Not little darling, cute, need to coddle and caress, but guns you can beat the hell out of politicians with and then turn around without missing a beat and shoot the lawyers and bankers. Not using an anemic little poodle shooter round. Of course, by admitting that the Lee-Enfield was the rifle of choice, they forever cemented a place in my heart. What's my e-mail handle? What's the exit number of Elko? I would also like to thank Jay from MD for the snail mail donation. Very generous, indeedily.
*
Now, I know that at least once a week I give out a piercing, girlish scream of fear and point with a trembling finger to yet another looming disaster that we should all drop everything to worry about. It isn't really my intention to convey too much worry in and of itself. We all know something bad is going to happen. We just don't known when and exactly what. These attacks of anxiety are really nothing more than gaming possibilities and pointing out potential areas of concern. So that you may, if you are inclined to agree, take certain extra precautions. Since this week Uncle Obammy is trying to focus our attention on his left hand while his right hand puts a little more sand on the dildo he's about to shove up our rear orifice, it seems topical to discuss nuclear weapons being used. I don't know what all the fuss is about, frankly. Oh, I realize some is misdirection to take our attention off the economy. But I'm sure there is plenty of genuine concern out there. That North Korea will nuke South Korea. I can't remember the percentage of the population that lives in Soul but it is a significant number. One small yield nuke will wipe out the country. Why? Because with the economic meltdown, the South no longer has surplus wealth it can bribe the north with. One nuke, and suddenly there are a lot more rice fields available. It's only far fetched until the US is distracted enough the north feels it can get away with it. And don't think China is a deterrent. They would love to see thirty thousand American troops gone from the region ( I'm discounting Japan of course, but once our treasury is empty after Zimbabwe inflation so will our military bases in both countries- so you can add to that figure of thirty grand ).
*
Aren't we getting ready to help Israel with an attack on Iran? I might be a bit fuzzy on those details. Perhaps Israel can't get our help so they will do it on their own. No matter, the odds are good that somewhere between the Mediterranean and the Himalayas a nuke or two will be used soon. We were pretty generous with our nuclear technology and actual weapons after the Second World War. Britain, France, Israel ( we might even have helped India years later to keep them in our camp ). And the Soviets did their part almost twenty years ago. It's very possible it was all a few renegade generals selling suitcase nukes to terrorists, but my money is on the state security apparatus being behind those deals. The point is, before a few countries had nukes and used them as defense. Now, everyone and his brother has them and they will be used sooner or later, somewhere or another.
*
As the economy implodes as energy supplies shrink, the nuclear option looks better and better. Not enough energy to fight a ten year war with conventional weapons? Just nuke 'em til they glow in the dark. Nuclear weapons have been used before, so it is foolish to think it won't happen again. The US under the Goober In Chief declared we would use them offensively. Plus, the recovery of Chernobyl more than likely took a lot of the mystery and fear out of nuclear contamination. It sure don't look good, does it?
END