TRIBAL DYNAMICS
Now, I'm going to write this post and inevitably some moron who somehow managed to hold on to his loyal minion status despite being dumber than a box of rocks is going to make a comment on how I'm a redneck cracker Klucker racist. Even with the following statement: racism is merely a tribal marker to help distinguish members of a group from outsiders. Yes, I understand it might be easy for me to sit and preach, being in the white male position and never having been exposed to discrimination other than being white in Hawaii, being a white male applying to a quota system job and being male in a divorce. The most blatant forms of racism are easy to condone. We speak of ignorance, since the speaker hasn't mastered the highly educated method of hiding their true feelings. But, racism is a part of human nature. You can't change it. Tree hugging, Birkenstock wearing, Volvo driving, non-meat eating Democratic voting asshats will implore us all to just get along. They'll turn carpet muncher or enter into an inner-racial marriage ( before you throw accusations my way remember I've had two Mexican brides myself ) just to prove how enlightened they are. Just like the crude stereotypical redneck, they have no idea that playing the racist card is merely a survival trait.
*
It is really quite simple. Tribes are necessary for survival. Humans can't survive on their own. You need a group. When resources start to dwindle, you need to attack a group outside your tribe and steal their supplies. If cooperation was an inherent human trait, we would have died off ages ago. Two groups, the resources will only feed one group. One group kills off the other and has enough to live. If both groups got along and shared both would die off. So, sorry Rodney, but we actually all can't get along. I don't know why Americans think they can change this dynamic. Perhaps because for three hundred years our resource base was always larger than we needed. Until a few decades ago, when we reached those limits. Now it is all downhill. We are still arguing that we might not have reached those limits and started down the other side of the supply equation, but we should be arguing over how long we have left and what we can do to survive. We were able to survive a religious and racial melting pot because of that energy surplus. Once the shortage reaches a certain point, all tribal markers will take on new significance.
*
Race is not the only tribal marker. Religion is another. Customs can be one, language another. The only important thing is that the differences must be readily apparent and important to the tribes themselves. To us, the Rwanda genocide made little sense. Village and family members were fighting each other. The reasons were simple. Resource scarcity. The farm plots had been divided too many times. Each plot did not support a family. The tribal markers they used to resolve this basic life threatening conflict were only important to them. We just need to realize it is normal and will eventually happen here. Besides rising sea levels and soon to be uncontrolled mosquito based diseases, another reason I chose to leave the South ( were I enjoyed living, all things considered ) was the coming race wars. The South will be the poster child for renewed racial conflict once resources become scarce and we revert to tribal survival mode.
*
Okay, enough justification for killing your neighbors. You do realize you will have to kill your neighbors, right? The tribe and outsiders are two different species. Look at Indians and how many have derivatives of The People, or True Tribe or such. Everyone outside your tribe is less than human. You have to think of them that way in order to kill them and steal their food. But, as importantly during the collapse, those that share your tribal marker but refuse to join you must also be considered outsiders. They can't be true tribal members. Oh, you can forge alliances, but they must retain that outsider status for some time in the future when you must go to war for their supplies. And, when forming the tribe you need members, not just allies. Sometimes neighbors must be forcibly assimilated or eliminated ( kind of like the Borg ).
*
Once the tribe has formed, the necessary norms adopted for survival must be enforced. This is were shunning comes into play. We look at Amish shunning reluctant members as an oddity. We feel sorry for the shunned because they want to be more like us. And we laugh at the sanctions because it seems dd to us the society they are being forced to leave. But we don't understand tribes. We don't realise that in historic times casting out a member might mean death to the shunned. It was a punishment. You don't have to worry about free riders in a tribe because they are afraid of being kicked out. Why do you think people put up with weird customs we think are barbaric, such as stoning an adulterous wife? Those customs work for that tribe, and those customs are considered normal. And because not following them means giving up the lifeline of that tribe. To leave is death.
*
So, to summarize. Hate all outsiders. It doesn't have to be marked just by skin color but by religion or language or any other accepted marker. Tribal splintering is normal in an energy scarce environment. Belonging to a tribe ensures survival. Fear of banishment forces compliance and avoids the Tragedy Of The Commons. Forming tribes is easy, just kill all those that won't join.
END
Have you bought all my crap yet? www.bisonpress.com
Friday, June 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
I do agree on the potential for the racial powder keg of South to be lit. As for the moral of 'Hate all outsiders' I disagree though being ready for them to hate you is probably not a bad idea.
Believe me, this tree hugging, sneaker wearing, Subaru driving, Democrat voting asshat liberal wants to kill my neighbors in a bad way, but I don't agree with your post.
I think the problem is that you're combining several "ideas" into one. Joining a tribe for mutual protection and combining resources is not the same as racism or xenophobia. For one thing, tribe loyalty doesn't run as deep as racism or homophobia. Switching tribes is like switching baseball team loyalty. You say tribal membership is necessary for survival. Post-SHTF, I can agree with that. Racism is not, will not, nor has ever been necessary for survival.
The post-SHTF tribes have not been formed yet, so it's too early to "hate all outsiders." Hell, as much as I hate conservatives, it's entirely possible my post-SHTF tribe will contain conservatives. For slaves and cannon fodder, of course.
Oddly, in my present state, I think I trust some people who are not my race more than I trust some people that are. Same with religion. I think that's what's great about the U.S. Religion, political party, race, tribe, town, region, sexual orientation, gender, etc. are not quite so important as principles and character. The ones who survive might be the very ones that see through what separates us and instead sees what unites us.
I think that when times get really tough, the feelings hiding just under the surface will start to come out more and more.
Racism and hate will defitely be some of these feelings...
Look at what goes on in prisons, if you want to see competition between groups over scarce resourses. If any one of us has to go to the big house, the first thing we would do is link up with our own race. I don't think the Mexican Mafia would take me in.
yeah! we're better than them !!!
our tribe is better and stronger, it's democratic and has banned public smoking... plus gays can get married, too... won't that improve the gene pool ?
yes, hate the outsiders, blame it on the illegal immigrants (who pick your crops for pennies an hour) and you would be starving already otherwise. blame it on the honkies, blame it on the darkies, blame it on the jews, blame it on the pollacks, blame it on the spics, blame it on the wops. god forbid people would accept their shortcomings or do something about it...
have any of you every seen a politician who didn't blame a problem on the OTHER GUY. Have any of you ever seen a politician pick up a shovel and actually work anything but their jaws ?
i hate to say it, but i don't think you can put more than 3 or 4 Americans together and have anything but 3 or 4 people who think they are better than everybody else and ought to be 'in charge'... i don't know if it's the schooling, our everyman and women for themselves morality, or if it's something sinister in food additives and the stuff their putting in the booze now.
basically, i don't want any smelly stupid lazy yankees in my group...
oh goodness! Hitler did invent the computer (and not al bore) and here's his blog as proof....
http://www.hoolinet.com/History/IfAdolfHitlerhadaBlog/tabid/412/Default.aspx
John Leo, who used to write a column for U.S. News, wrote an article on a related topic: the negative effects of diversity. I think it dovetails somewhat with what you have posted. The article is at
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnLeo/2007/06/26/bowling_with_our_own?contact=true
When you're in a the good Dr. Malthus' clutches (i.e., you don't have the massive energy surplus granted by massive colonization or fossil fuels) things look far different. Your population supporting potential is far lower, but your population still wants to grow exponentially. If you manage to restrain your own population, you still have to deal with other groups that haven't done so. So your budding post-apocalyptic group needs more and more lebensraum every generation. Where do you get it? The historical answer is to get it from the Other, and/or bleed your population white periodically with 'senseless wars', plague, and famine. To be willing to take the other's land and slaughter most of their men, it helps a LOT to have some enabling beliefs. There are two big contenders---racism/zenophobia or sociopathy. Sociopathy is probably not enough to get you the manpower you need to do the deed, and sociopaths are much nastier fellow tribesmen than extreme racists---because after all, the extreme racist considers you to be 'human' although he denies that distinction to the Other, whereas the sociopath thinks he's the only one who is 'human'. Most of our present day moral code is an artifact of our massive energy surplus. Does anyone think it is an accident that Christians suddenly discovered a moral imperative against slavery at almost exactly the time that it became economically feasible due to a greatly expanded resource pie (lots of colonial lebensraum, the industrial revolution, and the beginnings of harnessing fossil fuels)?
Post-Fallout/Apocalypse/TEOTWAWKI, first impressions come from how someone looks & how they speak. Maybe what they wear. THAT'S IT. Of course, their actions could tell alot of about them, as long as it's not a con or ploy.
Unfortunately, the animal in us is more comfortable with those that we can see something in common with FIRST. Gotta accept it, it's the way it is. Imagine ANY minority. If a group of them come around a corner & see a lone member of the same ethnic group being harassed, bullied, or assaulted by another distinctly different ethnic group, what will happen? It'll look like something out of The Wanderers. I've seen it happen, it's very telling. I've had two white friends go to jail, one to county and one to county and prison, & they both eventually got it. They didn't want to be reduced to that level, looking at someone and evaluating them by their ethnicity (or "race", as incorrect a term as that may be). However, when the shit hits the fan, the odds of dividing people up by the color of their skin and having something reliable to work from is pretty good. More often than not, you don't have time to discuss ideologies with everyone. I'm not saying that we all have to go join the Klan or anything like that, absolutely not. However, when it comes to survival, we all know that there may be distasteful thing we may have to do to survive.
DON'T LET GUILT KEEP YOU FROM CONSIDERING A EFFECTIVE SURVIVAL TECHNIQUE, REGARDLESS OF HOW un-PC IT MAY SEEM NOW WHILE YOU'RE LIVING IN SYNTHETIC ENVIRONMENT.
Oddly enough I mostly agree but I think the outward specification will not be *skin color* as much as it will be AGE, GENEDER and DRESS. Weapon possesion, of course, overriding all else.
Sure skin color will play a role but, in many cases it will not be as decisive in our tan colored peoples as it would have been just a generation ago.
Should, for example I see a couple of low jean wearing hat backward blinged out young males coming on to my property post SHTF I am far more likely to shoot first than to warn them off via other means.
Should a couple of print dress and bonnet wearing grandmother age ladies with dark skin come onto my property- I will probably (politely) tell them they are welcome to leave as I can not assist them.
Think about it.
Race? not so much. Cultural indicators- yep in a heart beat.
Post a Comment