Monday, July 20, 2009

retirement during the collapse

RETIREMENT DURING THE COLLAPSE
I know that from time to time I've made a totally innocent remark like "Social Security is Old Fart Welfare" or something similar and people get all bent out of shape and start ranting about a non existent "lock box" sounding exactly like Al Gore after he took a few strange looking mushrooms at an Earth Day parade. I once read somewhere that the average Social Security recipient gets back everything he paid into the system after less than two years. So, in essence, if you don't die by 67 you are on geriatric welfare. Now, having said that, I also acknowledge that most of us do benefit somehow from some type of government program. Or multiple programs. If the food bank where I work for minimum wage didn't get federal grants I wouldn't have a job. I don't care if you are sucking at the government tit, I really don't. 99% of all programs are going to be funded by fiat dollars printed out of thin air, not by taxes. All of our taxes go to occupying the Iraqi oil fields and paying the bankers interest. I only get bent out of shape when people come across with the attitude that they are receiving an entitlement. No, you are not owed a retirement. If you are lucky enough to stay on the gravy train, more power to you. But don't think I want the privilege of paying higher taxes ( you can bet the SS tax will go up soon, so indirectly it is a generational tax ) and prices ( through inflation that pays most of the recipients ) so you can retire to Florida and compound that BS with an attitude you are entitled to it in the first place.
*
Look, Social Security was a good idea at first. So many workers supported so few retirees that it was a painless way to provide a social safety net. Like high Union wages it provided a remedy to a problem. But then, just like High School drop outs thinking they deserved to make $30 an hour putting screws into sheet metal helped bankrupt the car companies ( I'm not discounting the role of greedy corporate types, just saying the Unions were equal in unrealistic expectations ), too many retirees have few other savings looked to SS as a way to retire, rather than using the system as a safety net. It became an entitlement rather than something they could fall back on if needed. Want became need. Government money replaced personal savings. I know government encouraged the dependence. I understand that inflation penalizes savings. I don't blame people using the system after all this time because that is basically all we've been allowed to have. It is like taking a civil servant job, one of the last avenues left open to a middle class lifestyle. I might not agree with it, but I understand how you have few options left. The age when you had the option of opting out from government help is pretty much over.
*
So, let's leave the blame game alone, agree that there is nothing to replace the flawed system, and look into the very near future to see how you are going to get screwed on your retirement. As I have pointed out to you before, there is a huge glaring warning sign for everyone to see. In the 1950's, the Supreme Court ruled that the government was not compelled to pay you SS. They never replaced that ruling and they certainly don't advertise it. But once the Feds start to seriously get squeezed between a much worse economy and increased difficulty in keeping the global peace ( i.e., anywhere our bankers or corporates have a stake in financially becoming harder to pacify ) the last thing they are going to care about is if Grandma Gertrude can pay to keep her air conditioning turned on the lowest setting ( I don't understand why Florida retirees blast the air conditioning and then wear sweaters ). As has been amply demonstrated recently, the little people are scum and unwanted. The shrinking pie will continue to go to the bankers, corporates and politicians. Just because the Seniors were once a great voting block won't mean spit in our currently unfolding energy shrinking economy. Welfare was a product of energy excess. Period. It had nothing to do with need or want or generosity. It was a placebo and pacifier and payoff. The ending of energy surplus means welfare of all stripes is going to end.
*
Even if the Seniors are still paid, it will be in inflated dollars. I wouldn't count on even that spit in the eye, but for a time you will be paid in official inflation rate dollars rather than in actual inflation rate dollars. That is already being done and might even account in some measure for the system holding on as long s it has. As Ms. Carpenter could tell you, air is an acceptable substitute for food. Soon, that will be the official government policy. Well, sure, milk is $50 a gallon. But you can find a substitute so food inflation isn't factored into the COLA. And, sure, a bus ride is $10 ( senior discount rate ), but oil will be coming down any second now so energy isn't counted in your COLA. And that is best case scenario, if they don't start doing means testing or just simply deny new applicants or some other form of denial. One fine Florida morning I waited in line at the Food Stamp office, surrounded by nicely dressed cell phone talking minorities. I had just had my child support payments jacked up and was left with $500 a month to live on. A bit hard with rent and trailer payments at $500. I didn't qualify because my gross was too high. That is the kind of thing you can look forward to.
*
Less immigrants are coming into the country, for lack of jobs. You can be sure that their past contributions made the budget numbers look pretty good. Now add in the high unemployment rates, the local and state governments going broke and the first huge wave of Boomers retiring this year. The system is far less viable than you want to believe. If the Feds were playing with COLA numbers at the very beginning of the economic contraction, how much worse off do you think it is now? Now, all that is pretty old hat. Let's introduce the latest and greatest. Health care reform. How much would you like to wager that the root cause behind its push ( besides creating another hopefully effective bubble ) is to replace Medicare and Medicaid and the Prescription Drug plan with something a heck of a lot cheaper? Again, we will see means testing. And, unlike with SS which requires a monthly check even if the amount is reduced, medical care can be postponed and pushed back and denied on first request, etc. You can save a butt load of money denying care until the recipient dies off and saves you a lot of trouble. And, this is a backdoor euthanasia policy. See most other nations national medical care for examples.
*
Just scratching the surface here on how the old ones will be abused and killed off. It's all about population reduction and an overwhelmed welfare system facing a shrinking budget. Not at first, but eventually you will be abandoned. So enjoy the check while you can.
END

10 comments:

TMM said...

As to whether they will cover you or not with their "new improved" plan.... you will be covered. They will be willing to "cover" everyone... they want your premium payment... THEN they will deny you the care.

If you look at the 16th page of the new health care initiative beinig debated now, it says right there that you will not be allowed to change from your current insurance, except to the gov't plan!

And if you dig deeper, you can find where it even says you MUST have coverage or you could be fined! Here in Oregon, if you have kids and no insurance, you can be charged with child neglect!

Don't think for a minute they will deny you a policy..... just the actual treatments.

Anonymous said...

There are a number of very disturbing things about our current health systems. One problem is that what "free" care there is (Medicaid and Medicare) actually inflate health care costs by taking away competition market factors. The other disconcerting problem has to do with litigation against healthcare professionals which reward astronomical judgements and produce skyrocketing legal costs. Another is the so-called "not-for-profit" hospitals which, in order to keep their legal tax status, build theraputic centers, and really unecessary, fitness training rooms and swimming pools.

I doubt the structure of Social Security is seriously threatened. It provides too many solutions like the kids don't have to take care of the parents directly. Also, many people are making a good living by conning the old: lawyers, the financial industry, the medical people, the government civil servants, nursing home interests, etc. As it stands now, the old get dit-squat. The oldsters are getting super-inflated money from SS. The 2 years return Jim Dakins talks about is probably not anywhere near the worth of the real value of all the moneys paid in. I doubt if it can get much worse for most elders. Many of my survivalist ideas come from oldsters. They are the pen-ultimate survialists.

bigunsfan said...

Good post James.When do we reach "Peak Entitlements"?

Cindy Brady said...

Old people stink and they are always complaining that things were better back in the good old days.

Why don't we put old people to sleep when they reach retirement age?

Lamb said...

I haven't paid much into SS...I usually work for cash...I don't think I have filed with IRS in over 25 years, and I have no illusions about SS being there when I become unable to work.
Good post, though...it should be interesting to see what happens when we reach *peak entitlements* as the comment from bigunsfan mentioned.

As for "Cindy Brady", I would prefer to see euthanasia carried out on snotty youngun's that don't contribute to society and have no clue how to take care of themselves!

Maitreya said...

I knew a long time ago that I'd never get old quick enough to see any of my social insecurity.
I've never gotten one red cent from Big Brother, though I've paid in all my life.
(Well, OK, I did get a few MRE's from Katrina, and I drive on the roads sometimes, but otherwise, NADA)

I don't expect anything from the fed, except more stupidity.
(like mandatory health insurance)
But, ya can't squeeze blood from a turnip.
If I don't have anything, they can't take anything.
(Except my freedom, and they'll have to kill me for that.)

Publius said...

Man, this Cindy Brady moron is really popping up everywhere!

I never liked the Brady Bunch when I was a kid... even as an 8 year old, I thought it was inane...
This must be the real Cindy Brady.

Al The Unbound One said...

Howdy, James! I read your _Walter Mitey Survivalist Papers_ back in the day of copy-machine 'zines with tiny print and pocket magnifiers. You're just as great now in the days of Web 2.0!

As for my retirement, I've just resigned myself to fighting rats in a gutter with a toothpick and a switch for a Mar's Bar forever. I don't even look at my yearly Social Security Statements because I'll just grow older reading how much money I've lost. Hopefully, if I can get into the habit of juicing, I'll be like Jack LaLanne when I grow up.

The Hermit said...

Well, if you are right and I'm going to get screwed out of my social security after paying into it for 39 years, I'll rob banks. I just have to figure out how to get one of those lift things and a van, so I can offload my wheel chair, ride in , rob the bank, ride back out, upload my wheel chair, and make a speedy getaway.

Maitreya said...

Hey Hermit, I got a van.
I'll drive....