DREAMS OF ANARCHY
Way back in the day, I accidentally introduced myself to anarchy when I ordered a book from the now defunct Loompanics bookseller. I loved Loompanics, with its strange selection of books usually available nowhere else. It’s catalog arrival was on par with sex or a surf and turf meal that someone else paid for. My first and only purchased article was through them for a catalog publication ( each quarterly catalog had two articles and the annual catalog had several more- to be selected was quite the honor ). One of the downsides to ordering obscene amounts of mail order books is you end up with a lot of expensive ass wipe or fire starter. One of the great things is that you run across treasures unexpectedly. I’m not positive, I think the title was “A market for liberty”. Anyway, at the time I was under the oppressive thumb of the Big Green Weenie and ripe for revolution. Anarchy was just what the doctor ordered. And to be clear, anarchy as in the literal definition “no government”, not the propaganda laden meaning of violence and mayhem.
*
Looking back, the study and love for the subject has not weathered time easily. I no longer care to study politics, now understanding that government is no more than a dancing puppet for the central bankers. How could I possibly have gotten excited that a foreign born half breed Muslim got elected when the whole thing is just a farce, being a Selection rather than an Election? I don’t get too worked up about economics anymore either, now that the big players have pretty much rigged the game and any market moves send out the wrong information. And the possibility of a system of liberty has recently been under assault as I have been studying the possible life after a collapse. Is it even possible that an anarchist society can ever be achieved ( to clarify, my previous article on an anarchist society now seems naïve as I was basing it on a resource rich environment )?
*
It’s not that I don’t strongly believe in anarchy, I still do. Heck, I still think Libertarians are pussies. You can’t just have a little government, it’s all or nothing. I’m just no longer sure it can ever happen. I ran across a blurb stating that anthropologists can correctly guess any societies social customs based on how they get their food ( if anyone knows a book on that, please let me know as I think it would have fascination details ). Farmers will always follow certain patterns as far as marriage and government, etc., and nomads yet another. We can guess that farmers will never see anarchy, because historically they have always needed an army to protect them. Even America couldn’t have done without some kind of government organization clearing farmland of Indians. Certain conditions might decrease the level of government but I don’t think you can eliminate it altogether for farming. Nomads might have more individual rights, but I don’t think you can eliminate the warlord position. I don’t you can have nomads without them being warriors, and certainly they need a unifying leadership at times. Plus the whole “armies stealing the next tribes resources as survival” aspect.
*
Anarchist dreams were based on individuals being able to protect themselves in a modern industrial capitalist society. Unfortunately, Peak Oil kind of took a big steaming pile on top of that reality. That was the missing ingredient from the theory, that only an energy surplus allowed individuals the means to provide and protect themselves. Which was flawed itself, since only an industrial society needing central government protection could provide that surplus. Unless Abiotic Oil theory turns out to be true, as was the case in a recent sci-fi ( that genre itself is in jeopardy from Peak Oil ) book by L. Neil Smith. See how depressing it is looking at the big picture? Shattering your illusions and dreams.
END
Buy my crap at www.bisonpress.com
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Looks like you just repeated what Creedmore said today. You just used more words to say it.
"Libertarians are pussies..."
yeah! second the motion. viva l'anarchie...the nh freestaters have taken to staging anti-drug war smoke-ins, near or at police stations....
while the local leftist fag-rag is bemoaning people actually taking their rights seriously and protesting instead of doing something more "appropriate" like write letters to some asshole politician....
meanwhile the fags are up in arms because some idiot drunk managed to get the shit kicked out of him by a couple of jerk-ass pigs...
no it's "not police brutality.." but it's a "waste the state had to squander $30k defending" the storm troopers against "accusations" of "excessive force..." and now their psychologically damaged and fear doing their job because of lawsuits. i wonder if those thugee-cops will get a disability pension now?
Anarchist dreams were based on individuals being able to protect themselves in a modern industrial capitalist society.
I'm living the dream.I do what I want and I can protect myself.Just ignore the law.
I don't understand why people still play by the rules,the politicians shit all over the Constitution,why should we play fair?
Oh yeah,Fuck off William.
Hi... Looking ways to market your blog? try this: http://bit.ly/instantvisitors
Viva Le @narchy.
One may note that the second government in Pennswoods, Or what You now know as Pennsylvania was an Anarchist one.
Farmer Anarchists to be exact. They had a militia for defense and did quite well....Then the Crowns got involved.
It went to hell thereafter.
As far as people not understanding why Anarchists attack the symbols of the corporate entities. It serves better, they think than the old direct action approach that I favored.
But here's something to chew on. After the collapse, The only viable government will be anarchist in most cases as anyone trying to bring back the same old same old will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
Same goes for those who dream of bring dictator for life or king or military governors.
There in lies the problem with most survivalists...That old "we'll only have to survive for a few months till the state gets back on it's feet".
Implying rescue at some phase.
There will be no rescue.
Better get comfortable with the A-word.
Oh, "There Once was a dream that was Rome."
Dragon, I had read on those PA farmers. Awhile ago and my memory is fuzzy. But weren't they libertarian rather than anarchist? I thought they had a minimal government of some kind. Could be wrong.
The incident I was referring to was the failure of William Penn's first government. After that, the farmers had an attitude which was " We don't need no steenking Government". It worked well upto about the time of the French and Indian war. When the frog king and the Engleesh king decided to play chess using the colonies as the board.
though Libertarian views predate the founding of the party. The Libertarian party wasn't founded till the 1970's.
Another form of Anarchist Self government were the Pirates.
I just reviewed some early genealogies of early Pennsylvania. it could be argued either way I think.The core values of person liberties is quite evident in most of the early writing. The government was minimalistic at best with no executive powers. I have argued before that libertarian principles have existed in Pennsylvania in Many different forms prior to the founding of the Party. Anarchy seems to have been with us since the colonies founding though. Seems that the founders didn't want to repeat the mistakes of the countries they were in fact fleeing. Personal liberty and self determination have always played big around here. Even through some of the darkest times.
+1 for Bigunsfan and his suggestion.
Lately I also ignore "rules" and "laws" and "restrictions" that I don't agree with, didn't vote for, are patently stupid, and/or were paid for by others seeking to exploit me, in keeping with Thomas Jefferson's take on such (re: Kentucky Resolutions). If the aren't going to play by the rules, why should I or anyone else? Make me.
The pirates were on to something, to be sure.
Post a Comment