SUCKS LESS
Do you recall seeing those nicotine gum commercials? Quitting sucks, brand X
nicotine gum 
makes quitting suck less. While there is probably no one place that is perfect to live, there are a lot of places that don’t suck as much. Nevada is one such place that sucks less. And of course, it sucks a whole lot less as a place to live during the die-off. I think it has great potential
post-collapse
, but there is a lot of assumption built into that. Today, even though I’ve covered it before ( and quite frankly, what the hell are you doing expecting something unique or different? ), the reason why Nevada is much better than your crap hole for surviving the end of the Oil Age.
*
I’m not going to get into the tax rates and gun laws like I just did with the low
unemployment
states. Those kinds of numbers are helpful but they are usually taken as a whole, mixed up, shaken and stirred and then averaged out to either a “sucks” or a “doesn’t suck that bad”. You can’t really expect more than “doesn’t suck too bad”. Every place has its problems, and the place you choose to stay has the least of them, not an absence of them. Idaho might be trumpeted as the Super Deluxe Orgasmic Delight Destination for survivalists but it has its share of issues, from lack of employment ( this as before the current melt down ) to one of the top three destinations of the
Golden Horde
. It has food production in the mountains. California Pukes will be en route. As you might have gotten a clue about if you’ve subjected yourself to reading this site very long, I’m not a huge fan of conventional “wisdom”, especially not in the prepper/survivalist movement. I take delight in being its gadfly, both because I get to be contrary and because I get to tell people that they are full of crap. I would not recommend Idaho. I would not recommend agricultural areas. I would not recommend the South. Now, please don’t get me wrong. A paid for piece of land anywhere is better than a mortgage in the “better” place. Just as a bizarre rifle in a strange caliber is the perfect survival gun if you are proficient with it. The number one problem you are going to face in the journey towards the collapse is having a place to live. Everyone will lose their job, it only being a question of when. The second most important is going to be a food supply. I’m only talking about relocation if you have nothing to lose. If you are able to shelter in place without the bank repoing you, stay where you are ( if you are in a huge metro area and can actually sell your place and relocate, that is a different story. The priority is being debt free ).
*
The South is a great place to live now. I love the culture and the people. Far more than I like former
Californians
cluttering up the desert. The winters are a delight. However, after the collapse, there will be malaria and race wars. Perhaps even
Gore Warming 
flooding, but I think that is the least of your problems. You will have to concern yourself with immigration from the north, especially during and after the first winter. Agricultural areas will be a magnet for the idiots, not realizing that a hundred years of mechanized farming have stripped the soil of natural fertility, or that water is pumped up by electricity. Plus, both those areas are already crowded now ( if not directly next to the fields, very close in the closest metro area ). We can all agree that there are far too many people living in this country and come the collapse they will be trying to stuff you in the stew pot. Best to be away from them before they get their lazy fat asses off the sofas and into a lather over the lack of government checks.
*
Alaska has 1.2 people per square mile. Nevada has 23.4, which is a heck of a lot. However, if you subtract the very bottom tip of Nevada you eliminate the pestilent cancer that is
Las Vegas 
( sorry to any of my loyal minions there- it might be a great place to live compared to the US, but compared to the rest of the state it sucks ), which brings that way down. Besides, that is not even part of the
Great Basin
. Now, if we also shave off Carson and Reno which hug the Sierra Nevada mountains of the western edge of the Basin, you end up with only 3.7 people per square mile. That is far less than Montana at 6.5 people per square mile, or even Wyoming at 5.4. So, as you can see Nevada really is the best place to live outside of Alaska for low population density. On a really bad winter, about once every ten years ( although bound to increase as the weather gets more severe on both ends ) we see a minus twenty or thirty. In Alaska, outside a few coastal areas benefiting from the ocean currents, I’m sure that twenty below is a warm winter. Thanks, I’ll take Nevada.
*
Besides low
population density
, a very important factor in the die-off as it determines how many people are shooting at you, taxes are reasonable in the state and the gun laws are nothing to worry about. Remember, we are talking about the new and improved Nevada where we gave Vegas back to Arizona and let California have Reno since it seems half the population in that city is from Oakland anyway. Rural Nevada, may the city pukes who vote piss off and die, you jackals. I know quite a few of you moral majority uptight religious dudes will condemn the states population to Hell since we gamble and fornicate with prostitutes, but before you get too uppity, ask your church about its history of murdered pregnant nuns, the Inquisition and the collusion with Nazi’s. Oh, not Catholic? Then how about religious persecution in the
Colonies
prior to the Revolution?
*
Nevada, it sucks less.
END
The Official Bison Web Site
http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.
14 comments:
Sucks less,sounds like a beer commercial.RW
A well thought out,well written article.Who wrote it for you?
just kidding!
About your header, "Last one in the stewpot wins", I would suggest "Last one in the stewpot is first runner up"
A new state slogan
"Nevada it sucks less, except for vegas and reno"
Wow, bringing up the centuries old Inquisition. How about looking at the 100 million+ killed by the godless commies during our (or at least our parents' and grandparents') generation?
Next up on bison: becoming gay as a survival strategy.
I hope you convince everyone to become your neighbors.
I hope my northern NH winters will discourage the Golden Horde. It's a terrible place. Please go somewhere else.
"Last one in the stewpot wins!" -I love it.
The south has too many religious crazies and too much of a cultural fondness of violence for me. Plus, it's too hot and and there are nuclear reactors.
I'm thinking the upper midwest, somewhere away from the big cities, but close to the great lakes would be nice. Cold and snowy in the winters which would, hopefully, keep the hordes away. Nearness to the lakes would allow for trade and travel.
I lived next door to Idaho in Spokane WA for a number of years. The Spokane area was nice and should do fairly well as things shut down, but I'd stay away from Idaho as everyone in the entire state is bat-shit-crazy.
Now if i could find a survival blog that sucks less...
OK, I was going to comment about the sucks less philosophy but I got sidetracked by Michael and his "they've got nuclear reactors" comment about the South. Um, does he think they don't have those throughout the rest of the country as well? According to the Dept of Energy there are 104 nuke reactors at 65 locations in 31 states and those are just the commercial sites, meaning it doesn't include the dozen or so run by the Federal Government directly and the close to 10 that are run as research reactors. And don't forget the large number owned by NASA and the US Navy that are mobile. Since he mentions the great lakes specifically as place he wants to be, I have to point out that due to their large amounts of freshwater, they are dotted with nuclear power plants. I actually find my way home from fishing on Lake Erie by following the plume of one of them.
I don't think there is any perfect spot, I think JMD is right, there are just places that suck less.
Ah Nevada, the sweet scent of ashtrays and urinals.Tattooed,meth heads loitering in front of walmart, bible thumping morons burning the porch lite all night, afraid of the dark and the boogey man. $150 hand jobs at the local "legal brothel".FREE dinner after losing a $1000 . Why would anybody live anywhere else?
@anonymous 12:00 PM
Yep,he's an expert on that.
Well crap, we can scratch Lake Erie off the list...
Well if the only consideration is people, I suppose being prepared in the desert is a good place, you have water they don't. Long term though? Water is hard to get. Me, I'm in the shadow of Mt. Rainier. Mountains, Ocean, Puget Sound, lowlands - it's got it all. A lot of people too, but I figure 80 percent will be dead in the first two to three weeks. Bunker down, and wait out the slaughter. Long term, you need that diversity again - fish, farm, hunt 'n gather. You'll need it all. Only problem is finding a tribe, this type of heaven requires defending - maybe I'll be a duke or baron, when feudlism takes over.
Post a Comment