I’m not sure if I’ve insulted women lately. Old people, middle class, those who dare own the wrong kind of weapon. But have I insulted females enough lately? I’m all about helping a sister out, and the first step of recovery is admitting you have a problem. I’m sure that if you are acting like a raging twat you would want someone to helpfully point this out to you. Also, federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender so I really have no choice but to also insult the ladies. Whenever a women’s libber wants to justify some stupid behavior, she brings up the magical word that none dare argue with, “progress”. This is the same reasoning used by banks to put you in a thirty year mortgage, by the government to practice reverse discrimination and for Americans to use non-renewable fuel sources as fast as possible least their grandchildren dare to assume they get to share in the bounty. This has been the buzz word de ju’re all through the European global colonization and into the Industrial Age. Probably even since the dawn of the Agricultural Age.
Progress is mostly used to disguise and justify theft. Now, I’m not going to sit here and justify women being abused, or such practices as “honor killing” where a wife is killed for breaking a taboo. What I am saying here, repeating myself because the application of logic to the vast majority of us seems to be more painful than having hot wax poured over our genitals and the pubic hair violently pulled off, is that IN GENERAL, traditional practices served a very useful purpose and the modern banishing of them has caused more problems than have been solved and which will create far more problems in the future. Grandpa living by himself down in Florida where he can fill his diaper on the golf course everyday might be called progress, but once Social Security runs out he might discover that the elimination of the three generation household was a very bad thing. And when FemiNazis discover that the economy no longer provides employment for them, the elimination of the “dependence” on a husband might start to suck. All the oppressive laws on women such as no divorce laws and the compulsion to be subservient in the home and bedroom which were eliminated had an obvious consequence of broken families being the norm. When a women has the choice of being a housebitch and satisfying a husband, or for almost the same money being sent in the mail every month running a fatherless household, which will she choose? We can agree that this harms the children, but we can also agree that most humans are lazy sods and so pick the easy path. The great thing about custom and law is that it forces us to do the right thing rather than the easy one. Regardless of whatever excesses or abuses there were, a wife that was forced to keep a husband happy so that the family unit stayed intact is far preferable to children reared in a dysfunctional environment. And, stripped of all the horse fooey about well adjusted children, the survival of the species also benefited from this arrangement.
So, you can take all that equal rights crap and toss it out the window as soon as our surplus of energy is gone. All this granting of rights is little more than revenue enhancing schemes by the powers that be anyway. Divide and conquer. So, you are now an independent and equal woman. Your children are screwed up in the head and you have enabled the centralization of a tyrannical government power as well as a central bank to destroy a once colossal economy. Are you happy? Okay, enough of all that. Ground well trod already. Today, I would like to introduce to you an idea whose time has come. Bitchocide. Infanticide is the practice of killing infants as birth control to keep the tribes population under control. A ghastly practice but obviously once necessary. When diverse peoples practice the same thing it usual means it serves a survival purpose. Bitchocide is no where near as bad, and not only will it prove enjoyable but it will also help you survive. Come the collapse, you may very well have to kill off your bitch. I’m not speaking to those few that have a solid relationship. Those that use each other to benefit the whole. Those that have a stable marriage and family. I’m talking about those husbands that are held captive by the threat of financial nuclear meltdown. You will support me, you will put up with my crap, and you will expect nothing in return or I will screw you harder than all other parasitical entities combined. You will have nothing left. You will live out of your car and send me 60% of your gross pay. And, you will like it. The system is totally gamed against males. My own personal example- child support in Florida. The female only loses fifty bucks in support when her earnings go from zero to thirty grand. Gender equality, but only when it is convenient.
Okay, so here you have a very evil female. She pretends to be paternal, claiming she must provide for her children, yet using them as a weapon to avoid her share of responsibility. The kids are the main ones to suffer, but her need to be independent is paramount. Now, it is also possible for her to screw you quite well without kids. It isn’t automatically baked into the cake, but since Clinton’s definition of “sexual relations” and “is”, it has gotten a lot easier for the soulless spawns of Satan ( lawyers ) to attack what were once iron clad pre-nups and screw over the husbands. And for the record, I don’t oppose a fathers obligation to support his children, only the selective application of female equality as it now stands ( equal rights, unequal responsibilities ). If the bitch is this evil, on general principles she deserves to die. But you need a good rationale besides contempt, don’t you? You are too squeamish to crap in a bucket, so no one expects you to kill off the bitch without an excuse. How about this? If she is evil enough to blackmail you, evil enough to threaten you with homelessness, do you think she will see the light and repent come the collapse? Of course not. She will seek out the biggest, baddest, most testosterone laden warrior he-man around ( that ain’t you, with the cubicle grown gut, lack of hair and KFC sodden arteries ) and sell you out to him. And the more supplies you have, the easier it will be for her. If she’s old and ugly I’m not sure how she will do it, perhaps instead of selling her body she will sell the information for a percentage cut. I’m not a female so I don’t have all the good ideas on how to be treacherous if needed ( being treacherous FOR your husband is okay, just not against him ).
And don’t forget plain old revenge. The bitch wouldn’t let you stockpile when goods were dirt cheap, and now you are all going to die because she needed BOGO Payless shoes instead of a hundred pounds of corn in a bucket. At least you can kill her and eat off her for a time before you starve to death. It is just “desserts”. Just food for thought guys. And ladies, just because the law is on your side doesn’t mean karma is.
The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.