SMELLY PLEA
Oh, crap on a cracker, this is too rich. Goldman Saks, the evil financial
Masters Of The Universe
, sell off six million shares of BP right before the explosion in the Gulf. I wonder if they were behind the short selling of the airline stocks right before
9/11
. These people have no shame whatsoever. Nor any constraint it would seem. A trillion here, a trillion there, it still isn’t enough. Do I actually believe they hired a Halliburton
SEAL 
team to blow it up? I give it a fifty/fifty chance ( or, they were tipped off by Obamma who desperately wants to clear his IOU card before they JFK his ass ). They will snarf up government bail outs, give bonuses in the face of public outcry, interfere with government policy, appoint their stooges to the Treasury, etc. Who is say they won’t manipulate events for fun and profit.
*
And yet another rehashed, regurgitated, reintroduced subject matter for my swelling legions of loyal minions who demand the best and who get disappointed. I go in phases, in waves. I’m brilliant and original and darkly seductive for a bit and then all inspiration leaves me for a time and I just coast along. Blow me,
Dough Boy
. Creativity isn’t at the click of a mouse. Plus, let me save you $3 to $12. Read this, then buy lots of wheat and a water filter, and you don’t have to buy my book
The Frugal Survivalist
. You’re welcome.
*
The
M-16
has been in service for almost fifty years. It never deserved to leave the drawing boards. But then, military procurement has been rife with fraud and shoddy goods since the Revolution. In the Army I used the M-16A1, the .45 and the M-60. Only the 45 was worth a crap. The 16 would jam after being religiously cleaned, sometimes after only a few mags. It almost always jammed before we got back to the barracks. Here was our high tech military, fighting the
Red Menace
with rifles that had jams being cleared with sticks ( place stick on ground against bolt assist and bang away and curse ). The 60 was, if possible, even worse. Almost guaranteed to jam every belt. I won’t even get into the horrid decision to replace the butt simple jeep with the overly complicated Hummer, the waste of money and material going from fatigues to BDU’s ( just dying the OD darker would have had the same effect camo-wise ), the idiocy of hats without visors ( thankfully after my time ) or any other examples. Being stupid with gear is one thing, bribes and Congresscritters being what they are, but to keep the same mistake for a half century is inexcusable. The Lee-Enfield rifle, the British service bolt action for about the same amount of time, had the opposite problem. It should have been kept, if for no other reason that what they are using now is just another full auto .22 machinegun. Not that keeping it would have been a tactical mistake since the
Empire
doesn’t fight serious wars anymore. And, aside from very expensive choices, few modern arms are close to being as good as the old bolts. Not all the bolts of course. But I would not replace my Enfields with anything other than an HK-91.
*
The Russian bolts might be rugged, cheap, and shoot inexpensive ammo, but they lack a gas bleed safety. This info was from a 1970’s American Rifleman ( or similar mag ) article, so it isn’t like the warning hasn’t been around way before the imports began. It has been suggested that a gunsmith might be able to drill one, I don’t know. Perhaps Brother Creekmore would? The
Mauser
is very accurate, but very prone to jamming. One autobiography from one of those Japs fighting way past the end of WWII wrote on this ( I believe the Jap guns were essentially just Mausers ). The Enfield will not easily jam in the field. It laughs at dirt. Of course, you must sacrifice accuracy then. The Enfield ( the WWII version, the No.4 ) has peep sites where the others don’t. Also, no gunsmithing is required to install a scope on either the No.1 or No.4 Enfield ( the No.1 were from WWI, and had no protruding barrel from the wood stock. They are no where near as good as the No.4’s although their bayonets were way cooler ). All the other bolts are harder to scope. The Enfield carries ten rounds to the others five. The Enfields reload in half the time. They are more comfortable and intuitive, at least in my opinion. They actually have character. The others are impersonal weapons, while the Enfield is something you would call a “her”. Kind of the difference between a handcrafted sail boat and an aluminum canoe. It is kind of hard to describe unless you’ve carried one. You fall in love with them.
*
Yes, ammo is harder to find as there is no more surplus ( but that is the same with the 308 ). Yes, the rifles cost almost as much as the
SKS
. But if you want a battle rifle instead of a carbine, you will love the Enfield. Better design, better feel. Better
post-apocalypse
.
END
The Official Bison Web Site
http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.
14 comments:
What cal. is the Enfield? How much does it weigh? How much do they cost? Are they easy to find at any gun show? What do you look for to keep from getting ripped-off on any given one?
303 ( just a smidge under the power of a 308 ), about eight pounds, $125-$175, haven't been to a gun show in six years. The last one might be better answered by another, more "gun ho" type ( no, not gungho ). Without a headspace guage I'm not sure. However, the no.4's have parts to add to solve that problem.
Make sure the bolt and receiver have the same serial numbers and that the rifle can still in fact be used as a 10 rounder. It is very common to find enfield 3's and 4's which have been sporterized or put together with mismatched bolts.
I have a sporterized enfield that is a sweet little rifle for just throwing on my tractor or UTE but I would also recommend reloading to keep the ammo cost under control.
gas bleed, gas smleed who needs it, with what you will save in ammo cost you can get plastic surgery to fix your face and hands if the gun blows out on ya. Seriously I bought two of the Russian guns M38 ($120) and M91/30 ($99). The M38 is shorter and shoots better for me anyways. Ammo is amazingly cheap compared to all the other large cal ammo out there. Even the new manufactured Russian soft point stuff is pretty cheap. I just shot the M38 again this weekend and I love it. Kicks like mule though (note to self buy aftermarket butt pad). The M91/30 seems ridiculously long but I suppose if the rifling is good it will shoot farther out then the carbines.
Hey Jim,
I just bought your book "The Frugal Survivalist".
Now there's only one left at Amazon! Are you going to reprint?
Most everything you ever wanted to know about the Lee-Enfield.
http://www.enfieldrifles.ca/main.htm
You know who you remind me of, James? Your good ole buddy Al Gore. You're both in the doom business because you both seek to capitalize on it. Sure, your methods are more crude and hillbilly, but in the end you both are just two peas in the same pod. While Al Gore pushes his carbon credits and popularity with the left, you push your old curmudgeon and poor white trash attitude on your audience. Perhaps both of you were sired illegitimately by the same man, for you both still have stunning and luscious full heads of hair.
"They are mote comfortable and intuitive, at least in my opinion. The others are impersonal weapons, while the Enfield is something you would call a "her"...It is kind of hard to describe unless you've carried one."
Exactly so, Jim. The weapon just "feels right".
Google article on Enfield SMLE 303 British.
http://world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl04-e.htm
I enjoy shooting my 1917 Enfield 3006 which cocks on closing as does the SMLE. Rifles that cock on closing are rather faster to operate than those that cock on opening like Springfield 1903, Mauser 98 et al
More on SMLE 303 Briitish rifle.
http://everything2.com/title/mad+minute
http://www.smellysmleshooters.net/
You may think a bolt gun is too slow. With my scoped 1917 3006 I can make 5 hits on man size silhouette at 100 yards in 21 seconds. It is important to hit the bad guy. You cannot miss fast enough to save your ass.
James,
The Enfield are good rifles however the price has risen considerably. The local sporting goods store had one a few weeks ago priced at $300. J@G sale has them listed at $239 dealer cost. There no longer a budget rifle.
Yukon- the Frugal book, as all my others, are print on demand. They will never die! None will be available at the markdown tables! The price is high, my profit is low, due to POD, but at least they will always be available.
Anon747-thank you for noticing my wonderful hair, and now that you mention it, the milkman did look a lot like Al.
If anything, Goldman Sachs got tipped off when SLB ran away from the rig. Remember, never ascribe to malice what can be chalked up to incompetence.
As far as the M16 goes, the Army hosed it, not Colonel Stoner. His design specified a chromed bolt carrier and low residue powder cartridges. Naturally, the Army changed those to save a few bucks. The AR platform 'shits where it eats', but making the bolt carrier plain steel and using dirty ammunition took away the designer's two ways to minimize that problem.
Believe it or not, the M16/M4 of today is much better than the M16 you (and I) had. I know what you're talking about - my original issued M16 would usually manage 20 rounds before starting to jam - but I got to use a standard M16 from the armory in 2003 and was pleasantly surprised by it's behavior. Yes, it still needs regular cleaning, but I watched a company go through shooting requalification without a single jam.
I like Enfields (had one myself), but for the price, get an SKS, AK-47/74, etc. If you need to shoot past a couple hundred yards, get a Mosin Nagant. Hell, can you even see past 300 yards?
Post a Comment