When I mentioned the Druid Dude yesterday I forgot to pass on his mentioning that the next year or so his articles would lean heavily towards alternate tech ( you know, the funky homemade solar ovens and what not ). While you might groan and demean, preferring to paw through your stack of recent issues of Mother Earth News
*
Kunstler
*
I do not advocate state run economies. I’m not for communism or socialism or mercantilism. Central run economies only slightly worked for short periods of time and only with surplus energy ( and then after a time created more problems than they solved such as the welfare state that grew from the make work employment of the Great Depression- although the central bank created the mess and the government created wealth redistribution more to placate mass dissent ). It is not that capitalism is bad, for it was the least worst system of money distribution, but that money itself will no longer be central to an economy. As we devolve away from oil age to sustainable decentralized groupings, money will only be precious metals and wealth will be what feeds us ( land or cattle, for instance ). Trade will not be the central part of our lives as it is now as we trade for 90% of our needs. In the future we will produce 90% and only need to trade for 10%. And it will be precious metal because there will be no central authority to certify any other store of value. In a sea of petty kingdoms the universal trade unit will be silver and copper ( gold being so rare as to be the wealthy or nobles savings- do not for a second believe gold is rationally priced right now. It is seriously undervalued in relation to the credit and paper currency is circulation ). Sure, ammo or plastic shoes or whatever might reign supreme during a collapse, but afterwards as villages stabilize to securely produce food and outside trade becomes possible, a universal currency will emerge. Just look at China during the chaos of civil war and invasion. Silver was universally used as currency regardless of which faction controlled any particular area.
*
If we look at capitalism currently ( no, not true capitalism but the kind we’ve grown used to over a few centuries ), the entire system is in trouble. Credit, arguably the mechanism lubricated the entire machine, is contracting. To save itself over the last decade ( remember-growth is the only model when you borrow to build, sell, or trade ) banks have created derivatives as huge as twenty times the total global GDP. It doesn’t take a math wizard to realize that if only five percent of existing instruments go bad the entire economic activity of six billion souls for a year is wiped out. Obviously, it wouldn’t take but about one percent to kill the economy. If the economy isn’t already on its death march. Since the economic direction is usually a hindsight proposition it might be hard to know until it is over. Look at it this way. Banks are no longer creating credit, to a large extent. Credit creation is how they profit and survive. No credit means the end is near. Western civilization will end as the oil disappears, but long before then our banking system will have collapsed. Keep that in mind as you keep cash in the bank instead of ammo in the foot locker or wheat buckets in the pantry as well as silver rounds buried in the back yard.
END
The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.
4 comments:
I am more than willing to admit that you understand the economy way better than me. So if you will, please answer this question.
Since the greedy bastards who rule the world stand to lose a never ending revenue stream if and when the world collapses why would they be bringing it about?
Isn't the cycle of up and down serving them well. It seems to me that bringing the world to the brink and then pulling back has worked for a hell of a long time so why pull the plug now?
"My current take on these publications are that they are mere whores, apologists and mouthpieces to the central banks, but that could just be my growing cynicism".
How right you are! I too, used to subscribe to The Economist in the 80's (now I just read it online). That they didn't see the economic problems coming...or chose not to see them coming has completely discredited them, in my eyes.
As you sometimes write, "Nothing to see here,folks. Move along."
MR-I don't think the collapse is by design. The PTB are ruthless and smart at harnassing the controls of energy, but they are "along for the ride". The crash will take them by suprise as they are using a dwindling resource to extract wealth.
I agree that a collapse is not planned by the PTB. However socialist groups in the political circle have been successful in causing a decline in personal wealth. Poor people are easier to control. Also they provide a good voting base, all one needs to do is promise free stuff and an election is in the bag. Of course their is no such thing as a free lunch....too many inner city government services slurping subservient masses, do not know this, and they follow the cheese.
The collapse is only an over-shot of a progressive socialists agenda.
Remember in a socialists society the surfs are surfs and the PTB are capitalists. It seems they feel capitalism is only deserving of them. Look at Nancy Pelosi, she has amassed huge wealth from her democratic/socialists party affiliation yet she will proclaim to "help" the surfs to enjoy a better life.
Post a Comment