Monday, October 11, 2010

warming the cackles

WARMING THE CACKLES


Creekmore posted a guest article that warned of EMP attack ( Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat of the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack - 2008 ) and Chinese invasion ( MythBusters Season 3 - Episode 39: Chinese Invasion Alarm ) and a few other things. The replies varied between “read One Second After” to “why worry, you can’t control diddly”. An EMP might be unlikely, now, and a Chinese attack is both logistically improbable and unlikely because of our nuclear deterrent. As things stand presently this is quite true. But to deny the future possibility ignores history. Hitler didn’t attack Russia because he loved the idea of opening another front but because he wanted to control what he needed, oil. Yes, I realize he was getting it already from Russia on favorable trade terms. So that does throw a monkey wrench into that explanation. There was something else afoot. But wars are fought over water and oil and food. As the oil decreases, military adventures previously presumed to be suicidal or ill advised will be tried. I don’t think China will bother invading our country, per se. Perhaps a coastal area or two for oil and farmland, but not the whole country. Who the hell wants to occupy Detroit ( Doctor Detroit )? But if they do it will be once our nuclear threat has decreased. I would assume they will have better luck attacking their neighbors. Closer, cheaper, less blowback. The whole point to keep in mind is that the whole military equation will change as oil becomes dear ( I might claim that point is already here ).

*

And over at Survival Acres, we are treated to a few fun facts that will warm the cackles of your heart. http://survivalacres.com/wordpress/?p=2072

I normally take his eco doom and gloom with a dose of salt. We are all going to die, but I think resource depletion will kill us before pollution. Too many commodities are only now available by increased energy use for their extraction ( very little ore or coal left in tons of rock requiring extra energy to separate ) at a time energy is becoming scarcer. However, his simple question on global warming ( The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the World's Top Climate Scientists ) does get one to perk up their ears and wonder aloud. If we had rising temperatures during the waning of solar energy, how hot will it get after the solar energy swings back to maximum? Leave aside whether global warning is man made or not. If it is man made, no one will stop burning fossil fuels so it will get hotter. And if it is man made, it more than likely already has passed the point of no return anyway. On the other hand, if it is natural we are still screwed. You can stop it as well as you can stop an earthquake. And even if we are not sure if cooling is our future rather than warming, it still doesn’t matter because either way we will see massive crop failures. Too cold is just as bad as too hot.

*

But let’s assume for arguments sake that we are seeing increased global warming. Rangerman is most likely screwed since the melting ice caps ( Why Are the Ice Caps Melting?: The Dangers of Global Warming (Let's-Read-and-Find-Out Science 2) ) will dilute the Atlantic conveyor belt and the American east coast and Europe will get a heck of a lot colder as everyone else gets dry and warm. Remember our last global famines a bit over a hundred years ago? The band from Brazil across Africa and into India all saw “global warming” crop losses and famine. Which supports the theory of natural warming over man made, but, again, leave that aside for now. We just went through year after year of droughts ( Monitoring and Predicting Agricultural Drought: A Global Study ) in all the wheat producing nations. And what if we see it again, with other areas seeing flooding ( the never arriving rain goes elsewhere ). What if it got any hotter? We have already “weathered” severe crop failures. That doesn’t necessarily mean we can remain untouched. It might mean we have no more room for error. No more ability to shake off those kind of disasters. So little international news filters into our consciousness, it is hard to get a good idea how many people elsewhere are effected by weather extremes. Our media does a wonderful job keeping the sheep from bolting. How many millions are going hungry in Pakistan? How much extra grain are they buying from the market, decreasing the supply? If we have no more reserves globally ( in ten years the reserves pretty much fed the added mouths even as yields increased, until almost no reserves remain ), how big of an increased demand from crop failure will set off a chain reaction? The lack of figures points to me the bad news being ignored, but I could just be paranoid. And all this is just weather related. What about our decreasing oil?

*

Okay, assume we will never run out of oil. Let’s not get into a food fight over it again. But our oil is becoming harder to get and more expensive. Already half of our nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing has moved overseas both to be closer to the natural gas ( High Noon for Natural Gas: The New Energy Crisis ) feedstocks and to decrease labor costs. What if something else added to that? A decrease in the dollars value would do it. A small supply disruption domestically. We’ve seen how small disasters escalate out of control. If you add in the likelihood of something else driving up the cost of food, factor in increased global warming, assume continuing population growth, what can you have other than mass grain failures globally? If we saw so many droughts, in Argentina and America and Canada and China, affecting grain crop yields for several years during minimal solar activity, how much worse will it get when the sun increases its energy output ( remember, an eleven year cycle )? And at the same time oil and natural gas are either more expensive or seeing disruptions? Or both? What if, put quite simply, the last three or four years weren’t aberrations but the new normal?

*

I’ve bellowed at you to quickly stockpile grain months ago. You didn’t listen. I’m sure this won’t change your mind. But hopefully it will at least plant a seed of doubt. It’s the best I can do for you.

END
The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
My e-mail is jimd303@netzero.com
*
Anyone can submit a guest article. No minimum word length, no writing skill necessary ( just get the idea across ). You retain copyright ( this must be your original writing ) and I’ll just use the once. I’ve yet to turn down an article, just don’t use the N Bomb or libel another that can sue me. Send by e-mail ( please, label as “guest article” so I can find it easily later ). Payment will be your removal from my enemies list.
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.

10 comments:

EMJ said...

Haven't chimed in for a while but this global warming thing really pisses me off. Forget the fact that they stopped calling it global warming in favor of climate change. That way, what ever happens to the climate they can blame it on the big bad industrial societies. Come on people, most of Canada and parts of the US were covered in huge glaciers at one time (probably many times). Do you suppose that the cavemen were having to many campfires and caused them to melt off? It is ridiculous to think that man caused an end to the ice age. The world is a big place. It has gone through many warming and cooling periods and will go through many more with or with out any contribution from man.

And listing carbon dioxide as a harmful gas is messed up as well. If it wasn't for CO2 what would the salad munchers be eating. Is the EPA going to start handing out fines to people when they exhale. The earth has had much higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere than we have today. And it wasn't because the cavemen were driving hummers.

So if you want to sell me on something then go back to the pollution issue. Man has definitely fucked up in that department. But to think that man is going to prevent or cause the next ice age is absolutely idiotic. And all you climate change groupies, look in to the earths history of climate change for the last billion years and then come talk to me.

Michael said...

Dude,

Hitler was high on meth and completely insane. He didn't attack Russia for anything even remotely bordering on rational reasons. You should checkout Antony Beevor's books.

russell1200 said...

The United States couldn't pull off D-Day today: and that was across a relatively small body of water. We might be able to pull off the equivelant of an Invasion of North Africa 1943.

The Chinese might (and I do mean might) be able to pull off the invasion of Taiwan without using nuclear bombs. The Alaskan route only looks good on paper. The Japanese found the Alaskan islands they captured in WW2 to be a complete waste of time.

EMP is very likely to occur within the general context of an overall nuclear war. Twenty years from now if some of the mid-league nuclear powers get better with their missle capabilities you might have a different story.

The book one-second after greatly overstates the immediate effect of an EMP strike. The best part of the book is that it does not ignore the plight of many people if our medical system goes away.

The effect of a solar flare(s) is similar to an EMP strike, and I believe that last big one was a little over 100 years ago. So I put that in with the catagory of super volcanoes: very real, but very unpredicable.

If you have never read Lights Out by Halffast (David Crawford) I would reccomend it. I think he is going to put it out in regular book form but it is still out in the eather:

http://homepage.mac.com/rfd1/.Public/eBook%20-%20Lights%20Out.pdf

It is not perfect on EMP effects either: but it is not as nutty as 1 Second is.

vlad said...

http://www.survivalblog.com/2010/07/how_long_can_you_tread_water_b.html

(excerpt) What about the (US) military? The nation’s military is largely unprotected from an EMP. Since the early 1990s, “Essentially all our new weapon systems have been built with a waiver for EMP hardening,” says Bartlett, a scientist and inventor who is the ranking member of the House Armed Services’ Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces according to a NewsMax article.

The Military would be pretty much immobilized although they would have more stored fuel and supplies than most. The good news is that if the soldiers who remained with their units could maintain order in the immediate area of their base, food could be grown the first summer.

Anonymous said...

The Internet is breaking down, hoard books people, I've never seen a 503 error but got one trying to post here.

Too much free speech makes the computers break down.

OK so, I need to point out that we were getting oil from Iraq on somewhat favorable terms also, but that didn't stop us from charging in to try to obtain is for sure. You see, Uncle Adolf just wanted to make sure.

mohave rat said...

You can't get people to accept reality. It stayed in the 100's the entire month of September here in the Mohave. It is 93 today.

I don't care why. Global warming,climate change, alien death ray? Who cares, it is still hot. Normally by now you can fish the river all day and catch fish.

This year so far all the fish I have caught have been wearing little sweat bands around their head and sunglasses.

You want to prepare for the next ice age, take that damn game controller away from your overweight kid and make him go outside and play.

the rat

Anonymous said...

Cockles, it is cockles you stupid fuck. Cackles are noises. Cockles refers to the valves of the heart. That is why the saying is "warm the cockles of my heart". What is more disappointing is that none of your readers are literate enough to know that you are totally ignorant of your and their language and culture.

EMJ said...

Hey Rat,

This is exactly what I am talking about. Normally you can catch fish all day. This year it was 100 everyday of Sept. Your reference for comparison is much to short. Look back a few million years and then tell me if these temps or fishing conditions are abnormal. This is the problem with the human pop. today. We need to look at the climate conditions averaged over much longer time periods.

Forecast are calling for a cold possibly wetter than normal winter for much of the country. So people drive those Hummers around the block a couple of extra times so I don't have to shovel so much snow.

mohave rat said...

Emj,
I don't remember that far back (HA HA) but I'm sure you can't tell about fishing the colorado from ice core samples from the arctic but I get your point. thanks

the rat

mohave rat said...

Dear Anon 7:21 PM,

I don't think a typo gives you a right to call anybody a "stupid fuck".

You are a very rude person.

You ever said anything like that to a man's face or are you just a cocky little bastard on the internet?

I have decided not to like you. You may now kiss my old ass you know-it-all little punk.

the rat

P.S. Sorry everyone for letting this shit stain get my goat.