Monday, November 29, 2010

lackey or shrill

LACKEY OR SHRILL


For whatever reason I decided to reread the wonderful book “The Long Emergency” by James Kunstler ( The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century ). Half way through I realized a few things. First, I owe a debt of gratitude to Kunstler for a lot of my information that has informed my journey towards full blown paranoia. Second, I think we’ve done him a disserve by disregarding a lot of what he has to say based on his few peculiarities. The problem with reading a large volume of information is that a lot of it tends to muddle together and you forget sources. Rereading TLE reminding me about a lot of my first exposures to certain problems ( or, if not a first exposure then at least the first reminder linking it to Peak Oil ). The fact that global warming is better thought of as global weather change. The “creep up” of tropical diseases to an area near you. Food availability caused malnutrition leading to disease susceptibility. The whole issue of alternate energy unable to scale up. And the list goes on and on. So, perhaps a bit belatedly, The Long Emergency is good enough to be in your short list of essential emergency books ( along with perhaps the Readers Digest “Back To Basics” ( Back to Basics: A Complete Guide to Traditional Skills, Third Edition ), “The Great Reckoning”( The Great Reckoning ), early Howard Ruff ( How to Prosper During the Coming Bad Years: a Crash Course in Personal and Financial Survival ), and whatever else I’m forgetting off the top of my head ).
*
Kunstler has also shown by example how to report the continuing collapse with sarcasm and wit. I won’t say he was my sole influence. I think you can throw in at least a half dozen others for that. But he certainly deserves to be acknowledged as one who diddled with my subconscious a bit. I would be remiss if I didn’t give credit where it was due. Instead, a lot of us most likely to include myself point out his politics as spoiling what would otherwise be a great thing. Anti-capitalism and pro-Obama. Well, I do think he places a childlike amusing hope on the ability of socialism to save us all, but I think he is more anti-corporation than anti-capitalism. And perhaps we can even excuse his naivety on grasping politics for the last hope of softening the hard landing. Not that I’m trying to detract from a great intellect. Kunstler brain could kick my ass with half its functions tied behind its back. My only claim is that perhaps I can view politics through a lens that will clarify a problem.
*
If you hate politics and view them as the bankers whores used as a mere tool, leaning left is futile. Or right for that matter. And if you confuse corporations with capitalism you end up supporting the faction that is eating our economic seed corn. And placing us into 10k plated handcuffs. You end up as a leftist lackey or a corporate shrill. If the bankers control the politicians and fund the corporations, then certainly you can’t vote to contain the corporate interests. Or vote for a smaller government. Yet even the central banks are controlled by events they can’t control, energy surplus. If they even know of its existence. Or can stop the government using the surplus to pacify the unproductive or the corporations from turning resources into profits. My guess is that the bankers are as ignorant of Peak Oil as are most of us. But we won’t get sidetracked. Back to lackey’s or shrills.
*
Of course you have no ability to change events. Your vote is a part of the circus meant as a pacifier, made indifferent by electronic voting machine hacks or political bondage to borrowing money. If it makes you feel better, by all means vote. You also feel in control of the weather when you nudge up the thermostat on a cold winters day. Your feet are clay so stop dreaming of god like powers. As my hair will attest I have the direct favor of the gods yet I certainly can’t control anything. But you keep on with the illusion if it lets you sleep better at night, as any good drug will do. What voting does do is put you in a distracted mood. Why fight against doing anything concrete about your financial bondage when you can effortlessly pull a lever in the voting booth? And why feel bad about buying Chinese made goods ( Poorly Made in China: An Insider's Account of the Tactics Behind China's Production Game ) when it makes those cuffs a bit less tight? No, I’m not throwing stones in this glass house. I’m just as guilty as the next peon trying to paste a layer of velvet over the iron fist. The only difference is that I try not to delude myself. I do try hard, success is another matter.
*
Corporations are not directly controlled by the bankers, anymore than the government is directed by them. No, the bankers just furnish a financial incentive to each. And the peons in the cage are allowed to fight one another over misdirected “masters”. Oh, god lord, look at the evil commie foreign born half breed leading us into concentration camps! We must vote for the free market and smaller government. Oh, woe unto us, the evil corporations are ravaging the environment! We must reign in their abuses with government control. And meanwhile the voters continue to charge the credit card, live in a mortgaged house and pay for seven years on an SUV. You reward the corporations with profit, the government with taxes and the banks with interest. Well played, indeed.
*
Staying out of debt is the only way to not pay for your own enslavement. Well, it is the only way to minimize your enslavement ( Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II ). You think paying a mortgage for thirty years on a farm makes you freer than someone living on junk land buying the food they need? It is just changing one master for another. But at least with the junk land you can be free immediately from debt and use the colonial tool of cheap subsidized ( by tax and oil ) food to insulate yourself from food bondage ( if you act immediately before global shortages direct your cheap grain overseas to our Chinese payday check loansharks ). Stocking up on years of grain and beans is a cheaper way to feed yourself than buying a mortgaged farm. It isn’t self-sustaining but neither is a farm ( to include a large urban/suburban garden IF it gives you enough calories and not just salad ingredients ) unless the bankers don’t own it.
*
Don’t be distracted by worthless arguments involving politics or corporate shenanigans. And don’t believe anything will change from Business As Usual. Just get ready quickly before the bankers eat their young as their surplus energy based wealth evaporates.

END
The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/

*
My e-mail is jimd303@netzero.com
*
Anyone can submit a guest article. No minimum word length, no writing skill necessary ( just get the idea across ). You retain copyright ( this must be your original writing ) and I’ll just use the once. I’ve yet to turn down an article, just don’t use the N Bomb or libel another that can sue me. Send by e-mail ( please, label as “guest article” so I can find it easily later ). Payment will be your removal from my enemies list.
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yes, but........It is VERY hard to find an affordable piece of 'junk land' that is close enough to commute to a town where employment can be had, AND has no zoning restrictions prohibiting 'trailer dwellings'. In fact, just finding ANYPLACE that will let you live in a travel trailer (without paying) is damn tough.

It might be better to go way out in the boonies and live in your camper, or perhaps an old school-bus, for 9 months of the year. Then spend 3 months in town in a ghetto apartment while working to make and save enough money to go live out in the boonies for a stretch again.

Anonymous said...

I think you mean shill, not shrill. Shrill is a good word to describe Kuntsler's writing in The Long Emergency, a book I do NOT recommend because:

It's a few years out of date now, and it shows.

It's full of neocon ranting against anyone who looks at Israel crossways and is all rah-rah Go Team about bombing Muslims.

The same info that's in the book is all over the 'net now, for free. An excellent source, is this thing called Bison Survival Blog....

Because of his hatred of anything not Kosher enough for him, I personally won't give a dime to Kuntsler but I will confess to reading his World Made By Hand and With Of Hebron, borrowed from a friend. Good books, if you've got the money to fling around on books. But then, you can get better Doom-fiction books cheap used, Lucifer's Hammer, On The Beach, Alas, Babylon, etc.

James m Dakin said...

Okay, another ignored spelling error. I know what I'm trying to say, but say it too fast and screw it up. My bad. Not COMPLETE ignorance, just lack of time.

Anonymous said...

You are right on about Kuntsler, James, he is a great intellect. Most on the evangelical circuit hate his guts. He has been calling this mess for years, long before Gerald Celente. I wouldn't label him a leftist as much as I would an anarchist. He would probably disagree, but I think his politics are closer to Derick Jensens.
Your own intellect is not so shabby sometimes as exhibited by this thoughtful post.

Anonymous said...

Bison, we all make horrible spelling mistakes, in fact the only reason I'm not worse ("with" of hebron geez....) is a decade of banging out Ebay ad copy for hours a day.

Now as for junk land within range of jobs, why do you think Bison is working on his writing? First I heard he's making $30 a month or so, but he said a few days ago that he realized "a couple thousand" over the last year, that's looking up. Notice Bison is arranging his life so that keeping things cooking along won't take more than a hundred or so a month.

Writing on the Internet won't be around forever, but it will probably be around as long as it's meaningful to have money to buy stuff on a regular basis, or the cities are holding people up for $60 a year in property tax.

I, personally, live in a travel trailer w/o paying. I'm a handyman on a fellow doomer's land. I re-roofed it, put in a better "french drain", replaced some sockets, it has a lot of patches over the holes in the walls, it's slumtastic! And I love it. Think slumtastic and be happy, foo. Come on, in a few days we're celebrating a holiday that for most celebrates a guy who was born in a fucking STABLE midwifed by a cow or something.

Anonymous said...

+1 10.29

after reading kunstler for a long time for his insightful economic perspectives i stopped reading when the ziocheerleader act got a bit overwhelming. never went back. never will.

Anonymous said...

10:29 Anon I believe you'll find it is Witch of Hebron. Unless, of course, you have a lisp and then I apologize.

Anonymous said...

I can't put my finger on the why; but I don't care for Kuntsler's books.

The fact that he is a past prime, white, bitter old man really comes through in his writing.

There are many other doomer porn books out there that are much better written.

Now having said that, his weekly blog article is almost but not quite as good as yours for one line zingers.

And let's be honest, his hair is a mere wisp of a glimmer in comparison to yours.

Idaho Homesteader

Anonymous said...

I read his weekly blog but that's about it.

He's keen to go on rants about anyone that drives a car...and yet on his current post this week he dismisses his flying to Australia with the flippant remark "the flights would be taking off even without me".

Seriously, the 7 billion people on this planet are not going to all go back to living in small communities growing their own food. And that in a nutshell is what he preaches.

Sorry Jim, we need specialization to support this huge amount. Granted there's too large a load on the planet at present... so the obvious answer would seem to be to support zero (and even, negative) population growth.

Only in his blog he even dismissed that. Fuzzy thinking on his part I would say.

Michael said...

Great post, Jim!