Tuesday, November 02, 2010

retrieved from the future

RETRIEVED FROM THE FUTURE


I believe it was last Friday that http://www.survivalblog.com/ had an article on how dandy and great the AR-15/M-16 family of assault rifles ( The German Assault Rifle: 1935-1945 ) were. Normally most of you know that this was a red cape waved in front of my face and that I would respond to it in a wild and irrationally explosive manner. For those new minions that just walked in and are surprised, the short story is I absolutely loathe the M-16. The long story, prompted by the Rawles ( Patriots: Surviving the Coming Collapse ) article is that the M-16 is a foul hunk of crap. Any government that sends its troops into battle with a flimsy easily befouled anemic assault rifle should be overthrown and its rulers hung from lampposts. Put aside the issue of assault rifle versus battle rifle. Put aside the limp member round. Assume that the assault carbine has a tactical place in the mechanized armed forces. Just on its design the M-16 is a hunk of crap. I loved it to pieces for its light weight and zero recoil but that is its only attribute. It jams WAAAAAY too easy. I was issued an A1 model in basic training. The same hunk of crap they used over in Vietnam. It jammed all the time in the field straight from parade ground inspection ready clean. You can’t tell me it was the ammunition like Friday’s article claimed unless we were issued the same type 15 years after the Vietnam War was over. As was stated in a reply to the original article, if you buy aftermarket equipment you can decrease the errors inherent in the design of this dog. So you pay twice the price for a carbine still performing poorly. Good choice.

*

I went to the ranch store this weekend to stock up on rimfire ( BARSKA 3-9x32 Plinker-22 Riflescope )( and incidentally to get Herself a better pair of mittens for the winter as the poor dear has the circulation of roadkill and needs to keep her hands warm ). Since my minions were feeling pretty generous ( I got two more payments in the mail-thanks Sam and DW!! ) and forcing cash on me I figured it would be a good thing to buy more 22’s. I toyed with the idea of more wheat but more ammo seemed a better idea since I haven’t bought but a few rounds in the last few years. Rimfire has nearly doubled as I’m sure most of you are aware. Factor in the sales tax and the shrinking box sized ( from 550 to 525 ) and it went from 1.8 cents a round to 3.3. I figured if I waited another few years it would be over a nickel a round. Better get another thousand now.

*

I also started digging again this weekend. I can’t think of a better return on my investment than Earth Pipes. You know, the deep trench that has PVC pipe that sends warmed or cooled air into the house. Put a few pipes down four feet for a hundred feet and the stabilized temperature of the ground warms/cools the air from the downhill intake pipe ( if you are on flat ground you need to have a pump to draw in the air- you can also go around and around on a lawn if you don’t have a straight 100’ shot ). I have no idea how this will perform but even a ten degree increase in winter added to my extra insulation will do wonders. My solar gain ( Solar Architecture: The Direct Gain Approach (Energy Learning Systems Book) ) is pretty good but there are also long cloudy periods plus nighttime that a little added boost will be a godsend. If I paid for a backhoe I’d double my cost so I’m going to manually dig it. Two foot wide, four deep, a hundred long. It’s going to be a bitch. The PVC I’ll buy fifty feet at a time for about $35. In no time at all, long before the digging is done I’ll have the pipe stockpiled. I’m thinking five pipes side by side, two inch types. Hopefully that will be enough air intake. And hopefully I won’t have to stop digging all winter long.

*

I also read a great fiction book this weekend, “Retrieved From The Future” ( Retrieved from the Future ) by John Seymour. Yes, the same John Seymour ( The Self-Sufficient Life and How to Live It ) ( The New Self-Sufficient Gardener ) that wrote all those books on self-sufficiency and farming. I had ordered it long ago once the used book price became reasonable, knowing if I waited the price might increase to insane levels. The guy being British and a non-fiction writer, I didn’t place much hope in the book and never cared about reading it. But a small bug crawled up my butt and I decided to tackle it. And it turned out to be far better than I had anticipated. Far better than a lot of American gun porn post-apocalypse. Why did I like it? Other than it kept your interest and was well written? Because he says what I’ve been trying to tell you for years, but much better than I have. Farmers must go through a period of crop confiscation and displacement and will suffer from power struggles over who shall rule them.

*

Now, keep in mind this was written in the mid 1990’s. I think he nailed a lot of current events. In the book, a combination of Chinese economic dominance cornering the market on buying oil and Shiite attacks against middle east refineries made oil supplies dry up. Today we have China buying more oil and so imports here shrink. And we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan which did take a lot of oil offline, to some degree mimicking refinery attacks. In that aspect his fiction written fifteen years ago before Peak Oil ( Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage (New Edition) ) was a known entity is very closely mirrored by reality. Not a lot of space is devoted to the causes of the collapse, but instead dwells on the lot of farmers and how society is dependent on them. All the panic you hear now about crops being dependent on nitrogen fertilizers and such was written about here. He doesn’t touch Peak Oil, but uses the lack of imports and terror attacks to highlight the point that the oil will run out one way or another and some day soon. He talks about the lack of transportation for crops, how soil has been killed by chemicals, how organics deliver far less but for far longer, etc. And not only are these issues talked about, he also goes into “big picture” looks at how an entire region runs out of fuel, fights over food, and transitions to a sustainable agriculture ( in England of course ). It is a combination of the personal and the wide view. Although only 200 pages, a darn good read and instructive. Turmoil, chaos, death, then transition.

END

The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
My e-mail is jimd303@netzero.com
*
Anyone can submit a guest article. No minimum word length, no writing skill necessary ( just get the idea across ). You retain copyright ( this must be your original writing ) and I’ll just use the once. I’ve yet to turn down an article, just don’t use the N Bomb or libel another that can sue me. Send by e-mail ( please, label as “guest article” so I can find it easily later ). Payment will be your removal from my enemies list.
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links in each article. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You just manage to piss a lot of owners of the ar15 blog and all their admirers.

You must have a lot ofknowledge on engineering. You must be a techie. You must de a prodigy, since you have a vast knowledge of every subject.

HELL..."YOU ARE APPROACHING MY WIFE STATUS"


However, I must be honest. I do not own an Ar. They are just toooo expensive.

I'm limited to a 10-22, shotgun and a marlin 1894 (44 mag) lever action. Oh yeah I have a Mk II.

Thats it. Way too much but what the hell I'm a big spender.

The Ar must be excellent and their price reflects this claim, their followers reflect this claim, The number of units reflect this claim, the armies armed with this arm reflect this claim.

Of course there are those that are antagonizing this gun but, they are just a few. less than you can count using your hands. But there are more antagonizing the .303 brishit. oppps, I meant british.

Someone said a famous say. IF YOU HAVE NOTHING GOOD TO SAY, "SAY NOTHING"

tweell said...

Bison, I also had the 'privilege' of using the M16A1, and it was indeed a lousy firearm. However...
1. Yes, the cheap cruddy ammunition was used well into the '80's before the army admitted their mistake and started buying the good stuff. 2. The chroming of the receiver also made the fouling less of a problem.
The M16A4 is a much more reliable firearm than the M16A1. Is it as reliable as a Garand M1, Lee-Enfield or Mosin-Nagant? Probably not. Is it reliable enough, given it's advantages of weight, ease of operation and rate of fire? For a lot of people, I'd say yes.
This is from a former M16/AR15 hater, by the way.

vlad said...

October 16 in Accepting Reality, Mojave spoke of the fact that physical conditioning is vitally important to survival. I spoke of my efforts in comments to Grandpa Survivalist. Others have not commented. Too bad. I might have learned something.

Ellen said...

Mr Bison blog person

Well got out and voted. Hooray and kudo's for me.

I have been putting my food in the freezer using the Ziploc vacuum sealer. It is the hand pump jobber. I bought it for survival use to put up garden stuffs and the dreaded no electicity days.
Well got out a package of ground chuck dated "08" and it was just as good as fresh. And no freezer burn. So think it is a better than fair to very good investment.
Now will warn you that either there are bags that won't keep a seal (make sure you run your fingers on the seal strip several times) from faulty bags or some things just don't want to seal.
But it is a sure thing 98% of the time.
I bought an extra one in case the one I am using breaks.
Just thought I would mention it in case someone out there is still thinking about it, and can't afford one of those mighty vacuum sealer's.

Anonymous said...

Jim, I'm curious. Why five 2" pipes instead of cheaper 4" (for the equivalent air movement)? Also, 4" thinwall or solid (no holes in it) drain tile would be cheaper yet. Plus, is four feet necessary? What is the frost line in your area? Just trying to save you some work/money.

Anonymous said...

Also, to add onto the other anony's question (and 4" is slightly under the same cross sectional area as five 2"), airflow is about more than pipe diameter. It is also about static pressure, that is the resistance of the interior pipe wall to airflow. Five 2" pipes have 31.42" of interior surface, whilst one 6" pipe only has just under 19. Meaning it will be harder to pull or push the same airflow thru five 2" pipes, meaning 6" will be easier on your system (less power consumed and provide more airflow).