GRAND POOBA
A few of the comments on the American Redoubt article were a bit harsh in their judgment of
Rawles
, Patron Saint Of American Survivalists. A funny one, he shall lead the legions of AR toting Yuppies to victory. A vicious one almost sounded like Rawles owed them money or borrowed the family dog ( don’t ask ) for the weekend and never returned it. Folks, here at the Bison Compound, we are rude, crude,
socially unacceptable
, bitter, petty and judgmental, but the one thing that we strive for is giving the devil his due. Rawles is merely a successful businessman. I don’t mean to detract from his accomplishments survivalist wise. I’ve said many times that following the Rawles plan is highly impractical for almost all of us, but it does smack on being nearly the perfect plan. And Rawles has done it without any help. He didn’t marry into money, or get an inheritance, but built up a safe refuge for his family one cup of sweat at a time. The man I can admire, which takes a lot to admit since he was both an officer and an MI puke. I just disagree with certain elements of his teachings.
*
Rawles isn’t trying to gather an army of darkness to swallow the
pagan
hordes into the benign shadow of his righteousness. He has just developed a business plan that follows his accomplishments. You can’t praise me or
Creekmore
for “living the life”, which really isn’t much more than living in a tin box on junk land, without acknowledging how great Rawles has done to practice what he preaches. I might disagree with his media whoreing, but that is just me and a reflection of my personality. He isn’t doing anything that
Howard Ruff
or
Kurt Saxon
didn’t do, playing by the medias rules to get publicity to sell their product. I’d even go so far as to say he is more hardcore than Ruff, and certainly more practical than Saxon ( Saxon is a god to me, the grandfather of
frugal survivalism
, but still a bit of a fruit loop ). Rawles strives to keep his stronger opinions to himself which might make for a bland product at times, but does keep that unwieldy ship of fools afloat. Imagine the backstabbing and infighting of thirty thousand different brands of idiots if he encouraged anyone.
*
We really shouldn’t fall for our own hype. When an outsider who has no idea of what we are all about, who passes sentence on ideas that are only superficially understood ( hint, hint, like
Greer
), that is bad enough. But when we perpetuate the stereotypes ourselves, which only adds fuel to others fire they are trying to build under us, we are not doing ourselves any favors. The Great And Wise And All Powerful Grand Pooba Of All He Surveys is one of those myths we need to not encourage. Of course, survival fiction is full of them such as the benign father figure of
Lucifer’s Hammer
( the senator on the ranch ), the battle god but merciful leader in
Dies The Fire
, from the same book the deluded medieval evil baron wannabe of the Portland bad guys, the hockey mask dude in
The Road Warrior
( the only good movie of the trilogy-the first was a “out of control crime wave of the 70’s” flick, the third an implausible cartoon [ where does the pig food come from-camel back?- to generate the methane? ] ), etc. But fiction is all about defeating an antagonist with a happy ending. Life doesn’t need a great and all powerful enemy to be normal, and happy endings are rare.
*
There will of course be every conceivable type of leadership after the collapse. Dictatorships, military governments, some fools will try a genuine democracy. Perhaps a lucky few will have a defensible position blessed with resources that allow a libertarian community. No one knows for sure which will be successful, we can only guess from history. My bet would be on a board of directors type of arrangement being the second most attempted ( after
warlords
of criminal gangs ). Successful? Who knows. But since no one knows how to survive in an oil free society, we are all feeling around blind ( we know how in general, we just don’t know how in a mined, polluted, resource scarce world left us ). By having a band or group trying to lead, you not only defend against your own ignorance of many things, you can’t be the sole target of discontent. For instance, I joke about leading the masses of admirers in Bisonia, but I’m sure I would make a poor manager. I focus on what should be rather than how things are. I would need others around me to soften the hard edges ( all women in veils! All children to the fields! Into the breech you cowardly dogs, to the greater glory of Bisonia! ), while I would remind them how far away from the cold hard reality they are. One hopes the middle ground turned out to be the best solution.
*
Yes, becoming the Grand Pooba is a pleasant fantasy. But it is just another one of those “sitting around the country store stoves solving the worlds problems” ways to pass the time. It is unrealistic to think any of us could do a good job leading and make good decisions most of the time. And predicting others will lead against us assumes natural selection won’t kick in. Incompetent leadership is possible, but only after a kingdom is established and secure. Before that, when leadership is being created, bad leadership is violently purged. The consent of the masses is always needed, even in a
dictatorship
( outside looking in you can miss this point. Germans embraced Hitler as the alternative was continued starvation and hyperinflation and mass unemployment. Iraqis tolerated the man who kept the religious factions from continual warfare, allowing a peace to the masses- above all the prime directive is to earn ones daily bread and feed the family ). Leaders don’t emerge from a vacuum, they are allowed to rule. The one who provides the peace and stability will be that ruler. Simple cost/benefit ratio is that even an extreme government is tolerated as long as the alternative is worse.
*
There will be Grand Pooba’s, but there will also be other forms of rule. The process of
Darwinist
selection will be brutal, but don’t fear the eventual outcome. The masses will get the type of leader they need in the end. Governments thrive always and forever as a benefit, a free lunch, a better alternative. Hell, even “the lesser of evils” is preferable all of the time. Forget civics class propaganda. The perfect form of rule doesn’t happen. The kind we need does. And we are usually happy for it. But it isn’t always or by default a one man rule of oppression.
END
10 comments:
I've been interested of late in how much of the survivalism writing on the blogs discuss a post-collapse world in the U.S. as if the government will just disappear and then we-the-people will somehow re-engineer government from the local level up.
At least at the federal level, the government likely has much more extensive survival plans and resources than any of us do (if they've planned on how to survive nuclear holocaust, they can probably survive anything). I think the federal government will continue to be the grand pooba in some way, shape, or form even in the face of some massive economic and societal upheaval. The fantasies of the don't-tread-on-me survivalists won't change that one bit.
I think people get "surviving disaster" and "re-engineering the world to my liking" confused.
http://survivaltimes.info/top-100-sites
Agreed on so many points, Your Royal Hairness. Rawles is an easy target because he sits at the top (King of the Dipshits?) of an otherwise bleak landscape of leaders.
Rawles completely deserves his due. As I mentioned in one of my previous comments, he has probably forgotten more about survivalism than any of us could ever hope to know. Survivalism is his passion, and it has been his passion for a long time.
When I first got into it, Rawles was my guiding light. I kind of consider him my "gateway drug" into survivalism. After about 6 months though, I found that his politics, his sense of humor, and his lack of sound advice on how to live TODAY left me wanting.
I eventually found Creekmore and liked him a lot. The commentors on his blog seemed like a tight community too. Unfortunately, in the last 2 months he has turned to the Rawles business model (where he relies on others to generate most of his blog article content), so I dont read his blog anymore. The audience-contributed blog articles on Creekmore make Rawles' contributors look like Survival Einsteins.
Anyway, there are only two guys I can read / listen-to now. You, Oh Mighty Lord Bison, and Jack Spirko at The Survival Podcast.
You, because you're funnier than hell and have a completely different approach vector to survivalism (and if you were not doing this, I'd probably being bumming cigarettes off of you right now at the Peppermill, trying to get a complimentary cup of coffee while playing the nickel slots next to you).
Spirko at TSP because his Modern Survivalism philosophy really resonates with me: Everything you do today should improve your life today - even if nothing goes wrong, get the hell out of debt, tax is theft, etc.
Anyway, thanks for giving Rawles some props today. Not that he needs them, but I do think it is unfair how everybody picks on him. The guy actually seems like a pretty humble and helpful fellow.
And as an aside, I'm pretty sure that he will be one of the last folks to end up in the stewpot.
Rawles is just working towards living every nerdboy's fantasy, becoming Attila The Hun.
He'll be King over a large and relatively barren area, with the living hard enough that his subjects won't get any funny ideas about telling him to go to hell - they'll be too busy dealing with a 3-4 month growing season, tending the poppy fields, and paying taxes to him. They'll be burning witches/warlocks, forbidding women from learning to read, and he'll be "breaking in" all virgins at the age of 14 in no time.
Imagine one of those fringe "Mormon" groups out in the desert where the gals are all knocked up by the patriarch by they time they're 15, only instead of a small group living in squalor, a large group with an elite not living in squalor, on the backs of a large group working their asses off, and living in squalor and fear. All hail Rawles! Surrender your daughters to the greatness of Rawls' dick!
In another era, the MI pukes were the ones coming up with new and imaginative ways to torture Vietnamese peasants. Rawls will simply be doing his Heart Of Darkness thing in-country.
It's good he's being so noisy about it; it tells the rest of us which areas to avoid.
I would think a compound would have to be ruled by committee, unless there is some patriarchial Father / Mother figure that everyone agrees should rule the roost. To the people who just got to be The Head Dude, it will be a rendition of Game of Thrones. :^)
I can also respect Mr. Rawles although I apparently am not welcome in his version of Christianstan (pronounced crist-jan-stan) per his description of the kind of people he encourages to move there.
A defendable position is hard to come by. In Argentina isolated farms were surrounded and overrun by raiders.
Concur on Road Warrior being the best apocalypse porn ever made.
SemperFido
Most of us shouldn't feel too bad about not attaining Rawles' level of preperation. It's just an economic reality that most of us have accepted long ago.
I thought of you, Jim whem I read this forward from a unique publisher:
NABAT BOOKS is a series dedicated to reprinting forgotten memoirs by various misfits, outsiders, and rebels. The underlying concept is based on a few simple propositions:
That to be a success under the current definition is highly toxic - wealth, fame, and power are a poison cocktail; that this era of triumphal capitalism glorifies the most dreary human traits like greed and self-interest as good and natural; that the "winners" version of reality and history is deeply lame and soul-rotting stuff. Given this it follows that the truly interesting and meaningful lives and real adventures are only to be had on the margins of what Kenneth Rexroth called "the social lie". It's with the dropouts, misfits, dissidents, renegades and revolutionaries, against the grain, between the cracks and amongst the enemies of the state that the good stuff can be found.
~snip~
It goes on, but you get the idea. I've said before that you are truly one of the most unique characters anywhere in the blog-o-sphere. You deserve to have financial success, but I fear it might 'soften your edges'. I wish you success nonetheless.
Read Rawles enough to know there is too much religious B.S. LDS soup kitchens with folks cannin' their sheeit.
Your stuff is OK except your faint praise of the yuppie site.
Mountain Rifleman
I would hope by now JWR's skin has toughened up.....Perhaps his critics offer useful insight. I do have a certin admiration for the man and his work. That being said Bison is a much better writer and frugal skills learned here are more pratical for most real survivalist. Not that Yuppies arent real, they just face a different challenge.
As for the Redoubt plan, Bision's points are valid. I like the plan in theroy. I would prefer a strong localized population of armed survivalists and like minded thinkers. I live in eastern Montana and believe me, strong concervatives are welcomed and needed here.
I think JWR's plan is important here because any collapse except in a world wide Mad Max scenero LEO and military forces will assume martial law. We will need to assert our god given right to live free. We will need strength in numbers. If we form the super majority the PTB's will not be our dictators, I expect they will leave our hornets nest alone.
I gotta tell you guys, for as much as I love Bison, the comments on his articles are also very good too.
The Anonymous 10:16 comment had me laughing so hard, I was friggin' crying.
I thought I was tough on people. Man oh man, you fellas are some hard-knocks! If JWR is reading this, I dont want him to feel *too* bad. A lot of truth here, but haha, it is certainly a brutal truth.
Oh, and Anonymous 11:09's comment about the NABAT book's mission; I'm on that page. One of the reasons why I like Bison's writing so much is because he is such a damned outsider. He is not trying to cover his advertiser's asses, swing specific products (other than his awesome book), or even please his Minions.
Tough crowd over here...but a good crowd.
Post a Comment