EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Evolutionary biology is one of those simple concepts that should have been obvious but is hard to sell because of such things as political correct thinking ( an oxymoron to be sure ). Humans have evolved physically to solve problems. Now, if you argue with other educated religious scholars about the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin, this might not be the kind of theory you want to go embracing. Odds are, you will be burned at the stake for your troubles with independent thinking. Dogma can’t allow the most obviously innocent dissention into the conversation for fear of such mental activity. So, even though Darwin was a religious dude and simply said that God created the earth and evolution also, most folks tend to side with the idiot that did a few back of the envelope calculations and concluded that God created the earth whole clothe like three thousand years ago and that was that, end of argument. And just to light a fire under said religious folk, then you have equally baffling theories which worship at the scientific alter purporting that everything evolved from a primordial ooze. Which isn’t any more logical than the existence of God. But if I said that then said same scientists would have “proven” just fifty years ago that plate tectonics was wild quackery. Anyway, evolutionary biology might not be the end all and be all as a theory, but it certainly makes a bunch more sense than sociologists blathering on about “blank slates”. Which might have made sense at one time as there was little else to take its place but now compared to evolutionary biology it sounds pretty retarded. The blank slate theory blames ( or credits ) everything to environmental factors. These advocates are, say, purple haired fat lesbians that claim that if you raise a boy around ponies and tea sets he will be all in touch with his feminine side and be all loving and when he hits puberty he’ll grab the first male butt he sees and try to have carnal relations with it ( actually, the gay gene already gave way to the gay chemical imbalance, but that doesn’t sell in the PC crowd ). The evolutionary biologists on the other hand claim that male and female are born hard wired in their behavior because they evolved those characteristics to survive better.
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon graphics above and to the right of each article. Or, visit
http://bisonpress.com/affiliatebooks.html
You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase. Thank you
*
Anyone that has ever had a child knows this instinctively ( well, they start to know it after a few months- before that they are too sleep deprived to know much of anything ). Which is why lesbians are the chief guilty party for holding views to the contrary. The idiots are living in book theory instead of reality. Other characteristics have evolved to help us survive as a species. Culture, for one. We don’t conform to any old cultural trait. We wouldn’t learn how to be pony playing tea sipping butt pirates if our parents were plastic penile pumping carpet lickers. Culture has to reinforce what is already programmed into our brains. Boys are naturally aggressive. When you encourage that by letting them brain each other with rocks and tree branches, everyone is happy, even the boys with dented heads. When you penalize them in a sports team for being “mean” or “competitive” and give trophies for participation, everyone grows up maladjusted and confused ( and probably wanting to be gay even if they can’t pull it off ). And evolution is not a quick process ( except in catastrophic circumstances when all other traits are suddenly extinct ). You need a fairly stable long term situation ( which is why we still retain all our hunter gatherer traits- ten thousand years of farming is nothing compared to hundreds of thousands of years of killing bison and picking berries ).
*
What does this have to do with survivalism? Easy. If you try to work against your programmed nature, you will lower your odds of survival. Right now, you are living as if the modern economy is how we are programmed to live and thrive. As if accumulating intangible wealth to acquire a mate is a viable strategy. Yes, right now that is what will attract a mate. But from a evolutionary biology standpoint, you are still a hunter gatherer. How good are you at hunting and gathering? I’m not saying that is a viable survival strategy after the collapse. There are way too many people, even after a 95% die off, and far too few animals. I’m saying that everything that has been culturally programmed into us is not a viable survival strategy. Women’s lib, the neutering of the males, all that sort of rot. Any female that sits there and cries to me about how oppressed women were a hundred years ago is as good as stewpot food. She has no idea how females have survived up until the modern era. They are the ones that lead males around by the gonads. The females are in charge, and the guys like it that way as long as they are able to act like they run things. And by the way, apropos to little, I’d like to throw in the fun filled fact as to why the female hourglass figure is so appealing. Fat on the breasts and thighs are signs of enough body fat for a healthy pregnancy, but show the right kinds of fat. Fat stomachs can easily point to health problems like diabetes and intestinal parasites. Males choose this body type as a preference, that body type is reproduced more, in time you get more of it. Evolutionary biology.
*
I just got done reading three books on this subject ( although at the time I didn’t realize they all followed said theory ). The Red Queen, Why Wealthy Men Have More Daughters, and The Dark Side Of Man. Of the three, I’d recommend The Red Queen.
END
The Official Bison Web Site http://www.bisonpress.com/
*
My e-mail is jimd303@netzero.com
*
Anyone can submit a guest article. No minimum word length, no writing skill necessary ( just get the idea across ). You retain copyright ( this must be your original writing ) and I’ll just use the once. I’ve yet to turn down an article, just don’t use the N Bomb or libel another that can sue me. Send by e-mail ( please, label as “guest article” so I can find it easily later ). Payment will be your removal from my enemies list.
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
There is nothing "wrong" with the theory that men choose women with large breasts and hips so they would have successful pregnancies. But it seems to be backward. Most animals like the smell of a females who are ready for conseption. A scientist might try to rationalize this to mean some kind of knowledge on the part of the male animals about how good a mother she would be or some other crap like that. But it's not that complicated. Mother nature or evolution if you prefer has created the desire in the male animals for that odor. Mother nature did a similar thing to male humans; that is it created a desire for full breasts and hips. It really had nothing to do with what kind of mother she would be simply animal magnetism ingrained in our DNA. Sometimes this gets over thought...
511- we don't know why we like big breasts, we just know we do. So this is just telling us that by bits and pieces over a long period of time more often than not that trait was passed on in females. We would hump a leper if we could grab the parts before they fell off. No, we don't care about anything but rutting. But evolution works out nicely that the things that are good for us are what we end up desiring. The Blind Watchmaker is suppossedly a good book on this also
Darwin wasn't religious at all by the end of his life, but his wife maintained the fiction that he was.
Post a Comment